2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.02.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fusion collaborative filtering method for sparse data in recommender systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though there exist various methods for addressing the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering, the complication increases with the increase in the size of the sparsity data. This problem is addressed in [16] where the linear relations and the nonlinear relations between the users are extracted, with the help of which multi factor similarity measure is calculated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there exist various methods for addressing the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering, the complication increases with the increase in the size of the sparsity data. This problem is addressed in [16] where the linear relations and the nonlinear relations between the users are extracted, with the help of which multi factor similarity measure is calculated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most methods measure similarity based on the correlated ratings between users. Although users' behavior have been considered differently [62], [63], there is no relevant published research regarding user behavior probability as a primary factor of similarity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We design a set of experiments to measure the system performance in the presence of varying levels of sparsity. The most efficient way to create a sparse environment is removing records, as described in Feng et al [56] who randomly removed ratings in the test data. In our experiment, we adopt the number of reviews per items to indicate the level of sparsity.…”
Section: Performance Wrt Sparsity (Q2)mentioning
confidence: 99%