2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy Bayesian network approach to improve the quantification of organizational influences in HRA frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayesian modeling is applicable for prediction, risk analysis, diagnosis, monitoring, reliability, and dependency [44] and it can act as a decision support system in government [45][46][47][48]. A Bayesian Network (BN) was developed to analyze the probabilistic causal relationship between the DPS components and actualize the study models.…”
Section: Modeling Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian modeling is applicable for prediction, risk analysis, diagnosis, monitoring, reliability, and dependency [44] and it can act as a decision support system in government [45][46][47][48]. A Bayesian Network (BN) was developed to analyze the probabilistic causal relationship between the DPS components and actualize the study models.…”
Section: Modeling Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with actual engineering data, this data collection process and use of subjective data are more likely to cause random error and deviation, leading to inaccurate results. Li et al [20] stated that the lack of an accurate and comprehensive database is the main difficulty in the study of human error. In their study, the fuzzy Bayesian method was introduced to deal with a variable value, but still the basic data were the scores given by experts who estimated the conditional probability for each causal relationship, affecting the reliability of the results.…”
Section: Importance Of Workplace Environment In Effectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…us, if a particular industry wants to understand its specific problems, it must collect data from scratch [34]. (2) Over-reliance on expert judgment: In the existing HRA method, the evaluation of factors that influence human errors (performance-shaping factors (PSFs)) and the probability of occurrence rely mainly on the subjective judgment of experts, which can easily cause a large random error [20,31,35,36] Despite these gaps, Liao et al [37] had proposed a human error model based on the CREAM that includes more variables that capture the characteristics of construction projects.…”
Section: Challenges Of Human Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i.e. : (Baraldi et al, 2009, Mosleh et al, 2012, Li et al, 2012, Groth and Swiler, 2013, Ekanem and Mosleh, 2014, Mkrtchyan et al, 2015. Causal traceability is a major need of HRA methods.…”
Section: A Concept For Model Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%