2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy cognitive map approach for effect-based operations: An illustrative case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Activation functions such as the sigmoid, hyperbolic tangent, step and threshold linear can be used in the FCM inference process (20), (21), (22).…”
Section: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (Fcms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation functions such as the sigmoid, hyperbolic tangent, step and threshold linear can be used in the FCM inference process (20), (21), (22).…”
Section: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (Fcms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carlucci et al 2013). This type of cognitive mapping has since been applied in a wide range of different decision situations (an extensive deliberation falls outside of the scope of this paper; but for further discussion, see Tsadiras et al 2003;Kok 2009;Salmeron 2009;Yaman and Polat 2009;Papageorgiou et al 2012;Salmeron 2012).…”
Section: Background On Fuzzy Cognitive Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights of the links (or arcs) can also be a fuzzy value within [-1, 1] (or follow a trivalent logic within {-1, 0, 1}). As such, there are three types of causal relationships between concepts: (a) negative causality (W ij \ 0), meaning that an increase (decrease) in the value of C i will lead to a decrease (increase) in the value of C j ; (b) null causality (W ij = 0), meaning that no relationship exists between C i and C j ; and (c) positive causality (W ij [ 0), which occurs when an increase (decrease) in the value of C i leads to an increase (decrease) in the value of C j (for details, see Kim and Lee 1998;Mazlack 2009;Kok 2009;Salmeron 2009;Yaman and Polat 2009).…”
Section: Background On Fuzzy Cognitive Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models established by a single expert are vulnerable to bias and inaccuracy. Credibility of modelling with FCMs can be improved by aggregating maps from multiple experts [111]. Thus, FCMs allow for a relatively simple knowledge aggregation, obtained from several experts.…”
Section: Aggregating Procedures For Fuzzy Cognitive Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%