2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs and its application to the banking sector in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This being the case, several researchers (Cooper et al, 1999;Despotis and Smirlis, 2002;Guo and Tanaka, 2001;Jahanshahloo et al, 2004;Kao and Liu, 2000b) started structuring FDEA models, allowing for the measurement of outputs and inputs as fuzzy numbers. Particularly with respect to FDEA applications on banking, studies to assess efficiency in the financial sector still remain scarce, and their major focus tends to relate to ranking of DMUs based on computed fuzzy efficiencies rather than predicting or explaining efficiency levels in terms of contextual variables (Chen et al, 2013;Puri & Yadav, 2014;Puri & Yadav, 2013;Wang et al, 2014;Hsiao et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2006). According to Hatami-Marbini et al (2011a), the huge dissemination of different models within a large scope of applications in terms of efficiency measurement demonstrates that FDEA models represent an effective path for handling uncertainty and vagueness when inputs/outputs are imprecise (Kao & Liu, 2000b).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This being the case, several researchers (Cooper et al, 1999;Despotis and Smirlis, 2002;Guo and Tanaka, 2001;Jahanshahloo et al, 2004;Kao and Liu, 2000b) started structuring FDEA models, allowing for the measurement of outputs and inputs as fuzzy numbers. Particularly with respect to FDEA applications on banking, studies to assess efficiency in the financial sector still remain scarce, and their major focus tends to relate to ranking of DMUs based on computed fuzzy efficiencies rather than predicting or explaining efficiency levels in terms of contextual variables (Chen et al, 2013;Puri & Yadav, 2014;Puri & Yadav, 2013;Wang et al, 2014;Hsiao et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2006). According to Hatami-Marbini et al (2011a), the huge dissemination of different models within a large scope of applications in terms of efficiency measurement demonstrates that FDEA models represent an effective path for handling uncertainty and vagueness when inputs/outputs are imprecise (Kao & Liu, 2000b).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, applications of FDEA to measure bank efficiency have been scarce and focused on ranking DMUs rather than predicting their efficiency levels based on a set of contextual variables (Chen et al, 2013;Puri & Yadav, 2014;Puri & Yadav, 2013;Wang, Lu & Liu, 2014;Hsiao et al, 2011;Wu, Yang, & Liang, 2006). This paper innovates first by focusing on Mozambican banks and second by simultaneously adopting three major FDEA models based on the α-level approach in combination with the conditional bootstrapped truncated regression, proposed…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every respondent describes his judgment about the innovation degree in his bank by the following linguistic terms; very low, low, high and very high. These linguistic expressions were converted into fuzzy numbers as (5, 6, 7), (8, 10, 11), (12,13,14) and (15,16,17), respectively. In order to establish the imprecise value of the innovation level for each bank, we used the following aggregation function.…”
Section: Used Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each DMU utilizes m inputs to produce s outputs in which s 1 outputs are desirable and s 2 outputs are undesirable such that s ¼ s 1 þ s 2 : Let x lk be the lth input used by DMU k , and y g rk and y b pk be the rth desirable and pth undesirable outputs produced by DMU k respectively. The technical efficiency of DMU k with the undesirable outputs can be evaluated from the following model (Puri and Yadav 2014):…”
Section: Arithmetic Operations On Tfnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DEA, there are numerous studies on the inclusion of undesirable outputs in the production process of a DMU like Scheel (2001), Seiford and Zhu (2002), Färe and Grosskopf (2004), Jahanshahloo et al (2005), Liu et al (2010), Jahanshahloo et al (2012), Ramli and Munisamy (2013), and Puri and Yadav (2014). To the best of our knowledge, there are very few studies in the literature of MC-DEA which have considered the case of undesirable factors in the production process of MC-DEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%