A Fuzzy Delphi Consensus Methodology Based on a Fuzzy Ranking

Abstract

Delphi multi-round survey is a procedure that has been widely and successfully used to aggregate experts’ opinions about some previously established statements or questions. Such opinions are usually expressed as real numbers and some commentaries. The evolution of the consensus can be shown by an increase in the agreement percentages, and a decrease in the number of comments made. A consensus is reached when this percentage exceeds a certain previously set threshold. If this threshold has not been reached, the moderator modifies the questionnaire according to the comments he/she has collected, and the following round begins. In this paper, a new fuzzy Delphi method is introduced. On the one hand, the experts’ subjective judgments are collected as fuzzy numbers, enriching the approach. On the other hand, such opinions are collected through a computerized application that is able to interpret the experts’ opinions as fuzzy numbers. Finally, we employ a recently introduced fuzzy ranking methodology, satisfying many properties according to human intuition, in order to determine whether the expert’s fuzzy opinion is favorable enough (comparing with a fixed fuzzy number that indicates Agree or Strongly Agree). A cross-cultural validation was performed to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method. The proposed approach is simple for two reasons: it does not need a defuzzification step of the experts’ answers, and it can consider a wide range of fuzzy numbers not only triangular or trapezoidal fuzzy numbers.

Development and validation of D-PATH website to improve hypertension management among hypertensive patients in Malaysia

“…The Delphi method requires several rounds of discussion among experts to reach an agreement, but the ambiguity and uncertainty of expert opinions persisted. 64 Therefore, to overcome the methodological limitations of the Delphi method, Murray introduced the FDT in 1985. 65 FDT was used in this study since several rounds of discussion between the researcher and the experts are not required, thus equipped with the capacity to minimise the risk of information loss and avoid any ambiguity in the data.…”

An Analysis of Barriers to Sustainable Supply Chain Management Implementation: The Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach

“…The Delphi method has been used for over a half-century to acquire group knowledge, and to do so, expert views are used to calculate the Delphi procedure [61]; however, human judgment assessment is affected by many dimensions of an individual's life experience, emotions, perceptions, subjectivity, and personal issues [62], which increase the ambiguity and uncertainty in experts' opinions. To compensate for the deficit of the traditional Delphi method, Ishikawa [63] developed a modified and improved version of the traditional Delphi approach with triangular fuzzy numbers, which is called the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM).…”

Ageing Suitability Evaluation of Residential Districts Based on Active Ageing Theory

“…To prevent subjective mistakes, the number of experts is determined using a fuzzy delphi consensus methodology [63]. A group of thirteen experts (eight older residents of the Mufu residential district, three scholars of the development of the ageing suitability of residential districts from universities, and two property managers from the Mufu residential district with five years of experience) were considered (n = 13).…”