A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis

Konstandinidou, M.; Nivolianitou, Zoe; Kiranoudis, Chris T.; Markatos, N.C.

doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.06.002

Cited by 197 publications

(136 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

126

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, concerning the sub-tasks of board-men, the highest value of cognitive failure probability (0.316) was obtained for the cognitive functions of planning and interpretations. Mirto et al conducted a study in 2006 in order to quantify the errors in the maintenance tasks of control room operators in the chemical industry using fuzzy classification systems based on CREAM; the results showed that most cognitive activities related to connection, implementation, monitoring, diagnosis, planning, coordination, evaluation, verification and authentication, scanning, and recording, in sequence (19). Given the results of various studies, errors are associated with human factors and ergonomics science and technology (human-machine interaction) (20).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Cognitive Human Error Analysis with CREAM in Control Room of Petrochemical Industry

Shokria¹,

Varmazyar²,

Heydari³

2016

Biotech Health Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Cognitive Human Error Analysis with CREAM in Control Room of Petrochemical Industry

Shokria¹,

Varmazyar²,

Heydari³

2016

Biotech Health Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this approach, the time has influence on two things: the first is the flexibility to evaluate the incidence, develop an action plan and take an action. The second thing is the process of change that occurs in the system,and updating the information of the changes [6,21]. The combination simultaneously to both of these as a function of time will determine the process of identification of events/situations, decisions and actions are correct.…”

Section: Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysisis Methods (Cream)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Human Reliability of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Operation

Santoso

2016

Tri Dasa Mega

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

FACTORS INFLUENCING HUMAN RELIABILITY OF HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS COOLED REACTOR OPERATION.Operator roles and intervene actions on the operation of gas cooled reactor would be different compared to their roles in other reactor types. Analysis of operator performance and the influencing factors can be conducted comprehensively in Human Reliability Analysis (HRA). Using HRA, the impact of human errors on the system and the ways to reduce human error impact and frequency can be idenfified. The paper discusses factors influencing reactor operator performance to response to the cooling accident of the high temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR). Analysis and qualification of influencing factors, which are performance shaping factors (PSF), were conducted based on time reliability curve and Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM). Based on time reliability curve, results showed that time variable contributes to the improvement of operator performance (PSF<1), especially when the safety features of the system properly work as in the design. Based on CREAM, it can be identified that in addition to the time variable, human machine interface design and sufficiently training also contribute to the improvement of operator performance. This study found that total PSF equals to 0.25, in which the positive dominant factor is time variable whose PSF is 0.01 and the negative dominant factors are procedure and working cycle whose PSF is 5. Those PSF values reflected the multiplier factors to the human error probability. The analysis of performance shaping factors should be developed on the other operation and accident scenarios of HTGRs prior to be further applied for a comprehensive assessment and analysis of human reliability and for the design of human machine interface system at control room.

show abstract

“…Specifically, results from recent studies demonstrated little reliability and validity within the healthcare setting of FMEA. The researchers did not disregard the potential value or conclude that the FMEA process offered no benefit whatsoever, but did apparently reveal flaws which necessitate process refinement (Shebl, Franklin, & Barber, 2009;Phipps, Meakin, Beatty, Nsoedo, & Parker, 2008;Konstandinidou, Nivolianitou, Kiranoudis, & Markatos, 2006;Apkon, Probst, Leonard, DeLizio, & Vitale, 2004;Lyons, Adams, Woloshynowych, & Vincent, 2004). These studies highlighted the discrepancies between the severity ratings selected by different groups as well as the lack of correlation of risks identified.…”

Section: Fmea Outputs Rating Scales and Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Building Evidence the Federal Aviation Administration's UAS Safety Strategy Needs Improvement

Wallace¹,

Haritos²,

Robbins³

2018

IJAAA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis

Cited by 197 publications

References 14 publications

A Cognitive Human Error Analysis with CREAM in Control Room of Petrochemical Industry

A Cognitive Human Error Analysis with CREAM in Control Room of Petrochemical Industry

Factors Influencing Human Reliability of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Operation

Building Evidence the Federal Aviation Administration's UAS Safety Strategy Needs Improvement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About