2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fuzzy-Multi Attribute Decision Making approach for efficient service selection in cloud environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Liang et al [ 18 ] integrated the EDAS (evaluation based on the distance from average solution) with ELECTRE (elimination and choice translating reality) models for evaluating cleaner production of mines; Wang et al [ 19 ] investigated the picture fuzzy MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) technique to solve risk assessment problems of energy contracting projects; Ashraf et al [ 20 ] modified the TOPSIS method for solving decision-making issues in picture fuzzy surroundings; Wei et al [ 21 ] presented a picture fuzzy bidirectional projection approach to assess safety of construction project; Luo et al [ 22 ] selected the site of tailings pond with an extended WDBA (Weighted Distance Based Approximation) method under picture fuzzy circumstances; Gündoğdu et al [ 23 ] assessed public transport service quality with the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and linear assignment model in picture fuzzy surroundings; Aydoğmuş et al [ 24 ] developed a CODAS (Combinative Distance-based Assessment) algorithm to select suitable ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems within picture fuzzy situations; Korucuk et al [ 25 ] proposed a CoCoSo (combined compromise solution) method with PFNs for evaluating ideal smart network strategies for logistics companies; Gireesha et al [ 26 ] introduced a picture fuzzy MARCOS (Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution) method to assess could service; and Yildirim and Yıldırım [ 27 ] modified VIKOR (VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje) approach with picture fuzzy information to assess the satisfaction level of citizens in municipality services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liang et al [ 18 ] integrated the EDAS (evaluation based on the distance from average solution) with ELECTRE (elimination and choice translating reality) models for evaluating cleaner production of mines; Wang et al [ 19 ] investigated the picture fuzzy MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) technique to solve risk assessment problems of energy contracting projects; Ashraf et al [ 20 ] modified the TOPSIS method for solving decision-making issues in picture fuzzy surroundings; Wei et al [ 21 ] presented a picture fuzzy bidirectional projection approach to assess safety of construction project; Luo et al [ 22 ] selected the site of tailings pond with an extended WDBA (Weighted Distance Based Approximation) method under picture fuzzy circumstances; Gündoğdu et al [ 23 ] assessed public transport service quality with the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and linear assignment model in picture fuzzy surroundings; Aydoğmuş et al [ 24 ] developed a CODAS (Combinative Distance-based Assessment) algorithm to select suitable ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems within picture fuzzy situations; Korucuk et al [ 25 ] proposed a CoCoSo (combined compromise solution) method with PFNs for evaluating ideal smart network strategies for logistics companies; Gireesha et al [ 26 ] introduced a picture fuzzy MARCOS (Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution) method to assess could service; and Yildirim and Yıldırım [ 27 ] modified VIKOR (VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje) approach with picture fuzzy information to assess the satisfaction level of citizens in municipality services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QoS attribute values are fuzzy sets. With the prevalent issues like vagueness, uncertainty, ambiguity, and inconsistency in the assessment data, recent works in MADM have employed fuzzy concepts like Neutrosophic fuzzy sets [7], Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IVIFSs) [8], Picture Fuzzy Sets [17], etc. to deal with the same.…”
Section: ) Fuzzy Number Qos Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above-mentioned common MADM methods used in service selection, there are also studies that apply MADM methods such as Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) [21], Best Worst Method (BWM) [22], Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) [23] to service selection. There have also been some cloud service MADM methods for interval number QoS model [14], fuzzy number QoS model [7][8] [17], and hybrid QoS model [18]. MADM technology has been proven to be very useful in selecting services with multiple attributes and different attribute weights, especially TOPSIS, which has been successfully applied to real-time decision-making problems.…”
Section: ) Hybrid Qos Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liang proposed a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based QoS-aware service composition model for cloud manufacturing considering logistics (Liang et al ., 2021). Cloud service selection has also been envisaged as a multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problem due to the intrinsic relationship among the multiple QoS parameters (Gireesha et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%