2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2019.106823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gagliardo-Nirenberg-type inequality and its applications to decay estimates for solutions of a degenerate parabolic equation

Abstract: We establish a Gagliardo-Nirenberg-type inequality in R n for functions which decay fast as |x| → ∞. We use this inequality to derive upper bounds for the decay rates of solutions of a degenerate parabolic equation. Moreover, we show that these upper bounds, hence also the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-type inequality, are sharp in an appropriate sense.Theorem 1.2 If p ≥ 1 and u 0 ∈ q 0 >0 L q 0 (R n ), then for any δ > 0 one can find C(δ) > 0 such that for the minimal solution u of (1.6) we have u(·, t) L ∞ (R n ) ≤ C(… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from this, in [11] respective classes of suitably fast decreasing initial data have been identified within which actually any logarithmic, and even doubly logarithmic, corrections to the algebraic decay of t − 1 p is essentially attained by corresponding positive solutions to (1.2) (see [11, Corollaries 1.5, 1.6, 1.8 and 1.9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this, in [11] respective classes of suitably fast decreasing initial data have been identified within which actually any logarithmic, and even doubly logarithmic, corrections to the algebraic decay of t − 1 p is essentially attained by corresponding positive solutions to (1.2) (see [11, Corollaries 1.5, 1.6, 1.8 and 1.9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is analogous to that in [12] with more careful tracking of constants and occasional modifications. Moreover, Theorem 1.2 generalizes Theorem 1.1 from the case r = 2 to more general values of r.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…At the core of the proof of Theorem 1.2 lies the following interpolation result (see [12,Lemma 2.3]). Note that for the moment we do not assume boundedness of L.…”
Section: An Interpolation Lemma In Lebesgue Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once more employing monotonicity of (L −1 ) ′ , we obtain (6.4) with C 1 := c 1 2 , C 2 = max {0, ln C 0 } and t 0 := max 2c 2 c 1 , 2c 0 L(ξ 0 ), t 2 . We proceed to ensure (6.3) under appropriate conditions, relying on two statements on decay of solutions to (2.1) in L q (R n ) for small q > 0 and in L ∞ (R n ), respectively, as derived in [8]. Lemma 6.2.…”
Section: Logarithmic Growth Of E For Algebraically Decaying Datamentioning
confidence: 99%