2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3064205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gans-Based Deep Learning Framework for Automatic Subsurface Object Recognition From Ground Penetrating Radar Data

Abstract: Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is a well-known useful tool for subsurface exploration. GPR data can be recorded at a relatively high speed in a continuous way with hyperbolas being artifacts and evidence of disturbances in the soil. Automatic and accurate detection and interpretation of hyperbolas in GPR remains an open challenge. Recently deep learning techniques have achieved remarkable success in image recognition tasks and this has potential for interpretation of GPR data. However, training reliable deep l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data samples generated can effectively improve the identification of subsurface defects and objects. 120 However, this type of research is still relatively rare. Further development of the GAN structure and training strategies is required to provide more realistic scanned images.…”
Section: Ground Penetrating Radar-oriented Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data samples generated can effectively improve the identification of subsurface defects and objects. 120 However, this type of research is still relatively rare. Further development of the GAN structure and training strategies is required to provide more realistic scanned images.…”
Section: Ground Penetrating Radar-oriented Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to seismic in oil and gas exploration, interpretation of GPR data is based primarily on reflector patterns, using radar facies to analyze rock formations in the underground medium [19,24,25]. The interface and internal structure of a geological body are interpreted in terms of the amplitude, configuration, and continuity of the reflector and its external geometry [26][27][28].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Gpr Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response features extracted from the peaks and their locations within the subsequent 1D time-varying amplitude signals by means of principle component analysis (PCA), are employed to classify the material type into three groups by using k-nearest neighbor supervised learning classification algorithm 26 . Other Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms have been successfully used for buried target recognition in GPR images include Deep Learning (DL), especially Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) frameworks 14 16 , 18 , 19 , 21 . 3D GPR data generated along longitudinal and cross axes is analyzed in CNN and LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) units combined into a framework of a cascaded structure for the detection of buried explosive objects and discrimination targets or non-target alarms 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%