2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gastroretentive gabapentin formulation for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Efficacy and tolerability in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis of 20 trials (7, 1417, 19, 21, 22, 2528, 3237) showed that for adverse events that were possibly or probably related to the study drug and could lead to treatment discontinuation and drug withdrawal, the gabapentin group had a 1.45-times higher risk than the placebo group (RR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.08–1.76; Figure 3); For adverse events that were possibly or probably related to the study drug and could lead to treatment discontinuation and drug withdrawal, the incidences in the gabapentin group and the placebo group were 8.19 and 5.37% ( P  < 0.001), respectively. Sixteen trials (14, 17, 19, 21, 22, 2529, 3134, 36) reported serious adverse effects. However, other than one case of headache (34), one case of serious dizziness and drowsiness (21), and one case of vision disturbance (19), no serious adverse effects were associated with the use of gabapentin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of 20 trials (7, 1417, 19, 21, 22, 2528, 3237) showed that for adverse events that were possibly or probably related to the study drug and could lead to treatment discontinuation and drug withdrawal, the gabapentin group had a 1.45-times higher risk than the placebo group (RR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.08–1.76; Figure 3); For adverse events that were possibly or probably related to the study drug and could lead to treatment discontinuation and drug withdrawal, the incidences in the gabapentin group and the placebo group were 8.19 and 5.37% ( P  < 0.001), respectively. Sixteen trials (14, 17, 19, 21, 22, 2529, 3134, 36) reported serious adverse effects. However, other than one case of headache (34), one case of serious dizziness and drowsiness (21), and one case of vision disturbance (19), no serious adverse effects were associated with the use of gabapentin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the first four weeks of active treatment, the dose will be increased to a maximal tolerated dose or to the target ceiling dose of 3000 mg/d, whichever is reached first. This target dose was chosen on the basis of previous trials that suggested efficacy and tolerability of comparable doses of G-IR when used to treat symptomatic neuropathy [2123], recent trials of G-ER in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDN) [24], post herpetic neuralgia [25] and menopausal hot flashes [56,57], and from dosage range recommendations from a panel of international experts on vulvodynia [10]. Moreover, the dose-response curve observed in neuropathic pain trials (without disproportionate dropout rates), necessitates higher doses to establish efficacy [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous RCTs of immediate-release gabapentin (G-IR) (1800–3600 mg/d in three divided doses) [2023] and recent RCTS with gabapentin extended release (G-ER) (1800–3000 mg/d in single or two divided doses) [24,25], have shown superiority over placebo in treating neuropathic pain. Gabapentin is listed as a first choice treatment in three evidence-based consensus guidelines on neuropathic pain, as well as being suggested as effective from data based on three retrospective trials in vulvodynia [2631], buts its efficacy in this population has not been empirically tested [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gabapentin gastro-retentive formulation (Gr-G) caused benefit compared with placebo with regard to 24 h pain score, with greater than 50% reduction in 34.8% of patients [17]. Evaluation of the Pd-G did not improve pain compared with placebo.…”
Section: Newer Gabapentin Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%