2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gatekeeper Chaperone Complex Directs Translocator Secretion during Type Three Secretion

Abstract: Many Gram-negative bacteria use Type Three Secretion Systems (T3SS) to deliver effector proteins into host cells. These protein delivery machines are composed of cytosolic components that recognize substrates and generate the force needed for translocation, the secretion conduit, formed by a needle complex and associated membrane spanning basal body, and translocators that form the pore in the target cell. A defined order of secretion in which needle component proteins are secreted first, followed by transloca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We anticipate that the novel receptor role revealed here and analyzed in detail for CesAB might be universal for translocator chaperones, even those structurally distinct from CesAB [e.g., the CesD and CesD2 class III chaperones of EspB and D (Wainwright & Kaper, ; Neves et al , )]. This would be in agreement with, structures of gatekeepers co‐complexed with chaperone homologues (Archuleta & Spiller, ), pull‐down assays (Kubori & Galan, ; Silva‐Herzog et al , ), and the abolished secretion of all translocators in SepL, SepD, and CesL mutants (Fig EV5H; Wang et al , ; Younis et al , ; Deng et al , ). In this capacity, SepL may act indeed as an early pseudo‐effector (Younis et al , ), that occupies EscV, switches it to preferentially accepting translocators and blocks binding of all other effectors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We anticipate that the novel receptor role revealed here and analyzed in detail for CesAB might be universal for translocator chaperones, even those structurally distinct from CesAB [e.g., the CesD and CesD2 class III chaperones of EspB and D (Wainwright & Kaper, ; Neves et al , )]. This would be in agreement with, structures of gatekeepers co‐complexed with chaperone homologues (Archuleta & Spiller, ), pull‐down assays (Kubori & Galan, ; Silva‐Herzog et al , ), and the abolished secretion of all translocators in SepL, SepD, and CesL mutants (Fig EV5H; Wang et al , ; Younis et al , ; Deng et al , ). In this capacity, SepL may act indeed as an early pseudo‐effector (Younis et al , ), that occupies EscV, switches it to preferentially accepting translocators and blocks binding of all other effectors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In contrast, deletion of the Yersinia homologue YopN results in constitutive secretion of effector and translocon proteins, suggesting some variability in phenotype between species (Day et al, 2003;Ferracci et al, 2005). The mechanism by which the gatekeeper regulates secretion of the translocon and effectors is not well understood; however, the recently characterized interaction between the Chlamydia gatekeeper CopN and the translocon chaperone Scc3 have led to a model in which a complex formed by the gatekeeper, translocon chaperone and translocon is required to form prior to the secretion of the translocon (Archuleta & Spiller, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Salmonella, the SPI-2 senses the neutral pH in the host cytosol and triggers the dissociation of a gatekeeper-containing protein complex (SsaL, SpiC, and SsaM), leading to the translocation of effectors into the host cytosol (18). Similarly, in Chlamydia pneumonia, the gatekeeper protein CopN forms a complex with a chaperone, Scc3, and translocon protein, CopB, ensuring the ordered secretion of translocon proteins and effectors (19). Yersinia sp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%