2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2008.4650682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gauge-invariant formulation for constrained robotic systems using square-root factorization and unitary transformation

Abstract: A gauge-invariant formulation for deriving the equations of motion of constrained or unconstrained multibody systems (MBS) in terms of (reduced) quasi-velocities is presented. We show that the square-root factorization of mass matrix and hence the quasi-velocities are not unique, rather they are related by unitary transformations. Subsequently, we show that a particular transformation leads to significant simplification of the dynamic modeling. In this formulation the equations of motion are decoupled from tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers [5, 7, 8, 30, 32] have used system-level matrices and operators to analyze and exploit the structure and sparsity of the mass matrix. Mass matrix factorization techniques and system-level global transforms to simplify the coupled equations of motion into diagonalized forms have also been explored [1, 2, 10, 20, 22, 33]. One common feature to most of these techniques has been the use of relative , instead of absolute coordinates [25] to parametrized the state of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers [5, 7, 8, 30, 32] have used system-level matrices and operators to analyze and exploit the structure and sparsity of the mass matrix. Mass matrix factorization techniques and system-level global transforms to simplify the coupled equations of motion into diagonalized forms have also been explored [1, 2, 10, 20, 22, 33]. One common feature to most of these techniques has been the use of relative , instead of absolute coordinates [25] to parametrized the state of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the corresponding dynamic formulation in not invariant and a solution depends on measure units or a weighting matrix selected Aghili (2005); Angeles (2003); Lipkin and Duffy (1988); Luca and Manes (1994); Manes (1992). There also exist other techniques to describe the equations of motion in terms of quasi-velocities, i.e., a vector whose Euclidean norm is proportional to the square root of the system's kinetic energy, which can lead to simplification of these equations Aghili (2008;2007); Bedrossian (1992); Gu (2000); Gu and Loh (1987); Herman (2005); Herman and Kozlowski (2006); Jain and Rodriguez (1995); Junkins and Schaub (1997); Kodischeck (1985); Kozlowski (1998); Loduha and Ravani (1995); Papastavridis (1998) ;Rodriguez and Kertutz-Delgado (1992); Sinclair et al (2006);Spong (1992). A recent survey on some of these techniques can be found in Herman and Kozlowski (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%