2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gaussian moment method and its augmentation via LSTM recurrent neural networks for the statistics of cavitating bubble populations

Abstract: Phase-averaged dilute bubbly flow models require high-order statistical moments of the bubble population. The method of classes, which directly evolve bins of bubbles in the probability space, are accurate but computationally expensive. Moment-based methods based upon a Gaussian closure present an opportunity to accelerate this approach, particularly when the bubble size distributions are broad (polydisperse). For linear bubble dynamics a Gaussian closure is exact, but for bubbles undergoing large and nonlinea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also accurate for highly damped dynamics, characteristic of low Reynolds numbers, as non-Gaussian statistics cannot present themselves. This result contrasts against a previous approach that assumed Gaussian statistics, which had demonstrably worse performance and higher computational costs [41]. The method would require more quadrature points for cases with more complicated dynamics, such as larger forcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was also accurate for highly damped dynamics, characteristic of low Reynolds numbers, as non-Gaussian statistics cannot present themselves. This result contrasts against a previous approach that assumed Gaussian statistics, which had demonstrably worse performance and higher computational costs [41]. The method would require more quadrature points for cases with more complicated dynamics, such as larger forcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We see that ε is smaller for CHyQMOM and CQMOM than Gaussian closure, though the difference is modest and more strongly associated with C p . The larger errors for smaller C p are associated with stronger bubble dynamics and the formation of non-Gaussian statistics, like skewness and kurtosis, that these closures do not represent [41]. One can represent higher-order statistics by carrying higher-order moments and thus inverting for a higher-order quadrature rule.…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, long short-term memory was developed. Despite that, LSTM has many drawbacks, for instance, the overfitting problem (Baek & Kim, 2018), computationally expensive (Bryngelson et al, 2020), and inconsistent performance when using various initial weight values (Massaoudi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Works have been specifically devoted to the application of neural networks to study and to model the dynamics of particles in flows and their size distributions. In this context, the improvement of physical models driving the PBE through ANN have been discussed, 43 control particle size strategies using ANN have been implemented, 44 particle size distributions have been approximated with ANN, 45 measurements of particle size distributions have been coupled with ANN, 46 memory effects were introduced in networks with feedback connections to progress in Gaussian moment methods 47 and dynamic modeling of component formation was coupled with a special class of ANN (regularisation networks), in order to predict the solid-liquid equilibrium in complex multi-phase flows. 48 Here, a combination of artificial neural networks (ANN) and convolutional neural networks (CNN) [49][50][51] is discussed.…”
Section: Please Cite This Article As Doi:101063/50031144mentioning
confidence: 99%