For many applications, mobile robots must adhere to, grasp, or otherwise attach to external objects to manipulate or anchor to them. In space applications, these actions may take place during satellite grappling, orbital debris capture, perching, or sample extraction. In many of these cases, specialized attachment mechanisms have been proposed because of the unique challenges found in the space environment. Namely, many attachment mechanism technologies that work on Earth are not viable in space. For example, electromagnetism requires ferromagnetic materials, which are not commonly found in space structures; suction does not work because of a lack of an atmosphere; and pressure sensitive adhesives, such as tape, outgas in a vacuum. Instead, there are numerous other technologies that, for a variety of reasons, are more attuned to the space environment. This article presents a review of such technologies with a focus on bio-inspired fibrillar controllable adhesives (i.e., gecko-like, microstructured, or dry adhesives), electrostatic adhesives, and microspines.The article is organized as follows. Section 2 provides an overview of potential robotic applications in the space environment. Potential is key in this instancemost of the technologies described in this article are mature and have been tested thoroughly in simulated space environments, but the leap from experiments to deployment in real missions has yet to occur at scale or even at all. Reasons for this will be discussed throughout the article and in Section 6, which looks at future challenges in this field. Prior to that, Section 3 reviews gecko-like adhesives, and electrostatic adhesion is addressed in Section 4 followed by microspines in Section 5.
Applications OverviewThis section details four applications for robotic attachment mechanisms in space and extraterrestrial use: 1) satellite and orbital debris capture, 2) perching drones for astronaut assistance and monitoring, 3) anchoring on asteroids and other rocky surfaces, and 4) climbing for planetary exploration.Following it are three sections that elaborate on the technologies.
Satellite and Orbital Debris CaptureDue to the exorbitant cost of launching a satellite, it may be economically advantageous to capture and service satellites that have malfunctioned or are otherwise in need of repair. [1] This concept, that it could be more cost and time efficient to repair, refuel, and otherwise service satellites in space as opposed to launching a new satellite, has seen significant traction recently. [2] In addition, orbital debris is already an issue as there are an estimated 34 000 pieces larger than 20 cm in low Earth orbit that pose significant danger to operational satellites, [3,4] even those that use physical protection. [5] There have been several examples of satellites being lost to or suspected of being lost to orbital debris. [6] Furthermore, there have been at least 16 maneuvers,