2010
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2010.2040177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Active-Learning Framework for On-Road Vehicle Recognition and Tracking

Abstract: Abstract-This paper introduces a general active-learning framework for robust on-road vehicle recognition and tracking. This framework takes a novel active-learning approach to building vehicle-recognition and tracking systems. A passively trained recognition system is built using conventional supervised learning. Using the query and archiving interface for active learning (QUAIL), the passively trained vehicle-recognition system is evaluated on an independent real-world data set, and informative samples are q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
173
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
173
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Ref. [10,11], we use the following indicators to measure the algorithm performance: detection rate (DR), false alarm rate (FAR), localization, robustness, efficiency. In this paper, the performance of a detection module is quantified by the metrics which are widely used [9][10][11]: detection rate, false alarm rate and average processing time per frame.…”
Section: Experimental Datasets and Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Ref. [10,11], we use the following indicators to measure the algorithm performance: detection rate (DR), false alarm rate (FAR), localization, robustness, efficiency. In this paper, the performance of a detection module is quantified by the metrics which are widely used [9][10][11]: detection rate, false alarm rate and average processing time per frame.…”
Section: Experimental Datasets and Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appearance-based approaches are more widely used in HV phase, the brief steps of these methods are: first capture the variability of vehicle appearance and then learn the characteristics of the vehicle class from a set of training images. Learning-based methods yield a decent performance in the recent literatures, such as Haar+Adaboost [7], HoG+SVM [8], PCA-ICA+GMM [9], minimum Mahalanobis distance classifier [2,10], HOG+Adaboost [5] and Active-learning framework [11]. VT is processed to make sure the vehicles in video sequences are continuously detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vehicle detection [2], [3], [4], [5], lane detection [6], [7], [8], pedestrian detection [9] and higher order tasks involving lanes and vehicles such as trajectory analysis [10], [11], [12] using different sensing modalities, is therefore an active area of research for automotive active safety systems, and in offline data analysis for naturalistic driving studies (NDS) also [13], [14], [15].…”
Section: Motivation and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While on-road vehicle detection techniques such as [2], [3], [4] detect vehicles that are visible partially or fully with varying levels of accuracy and efficiency, techniques such as [17], [18], [19] are particularly dealing with overtaking vehicles, which is relatively less explored [17]. Fig.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 shows 4 surround videos on the left hand side and 3 driver video streams on the right. Rectilinear cameras view through the front windshield (for lane [11] and vehicle [12] detection) and two out of the rear window while an omni-directional camera provides a full 360…”
Section: A Supplementary Videomentioning
confidence: 99%