2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General and Effective Numerical Integration Method to Evaluate Triple Integrals Using Generalized Gaussian Quadrature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let f(x) � 􏽢 g(x) − 􏽢 p(x) which can be further composed into f(x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ); then numerical integration can be approximated to equation ( 10) by applying the generalized Gaussian quadrature to evaluate the nodes and weights for the product of the polynomial and logarithmic functions [27]. e generalized Gaussian quadrature formula has been proven to give better results for integration over three-dimensional regions particularly in common applications in science and engineering [27].…”
Section: Optimisation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let f(x) � 􏽢 g(x) − 􏽢 p(x) which can be further composed into f(x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ); then numerical integration can be approximated to equation ( 10) by applying the generalized Gaussian quadrature to evaluate the nodes and weights for the product of the polynomial and logarithmic functions [27]. e generalized Gaussian quadrature formula has been proven to give better results for integration over three-dimensional regions particularly in common applications in science and engineering [27].…”
Section: Optimisation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above equation ( 33) can be numerically calculated using the triple gauss integration method (Jayan and Nagaraja, 2015). To improve the accuracy, six integration points were chosen.…”
Section: Finite Element Methods Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where we note that the values converge vertically towards the value of 0.2779460489911 as well as matching the values of integration in the last two rows when and by using the two methods R(MSM) and R(SMM). Therefore, it is possible to say that the value of integration is correct for thirteen decimal places when applying these two methods We can't use the fundamental calculation theorems to evaluate this integral, therefore, we can replace it by the approximation methods R(MSM) and R(SMM) where we obtain the results listed in tables (9) and (10) respectively. Where we note that the values converge vertically towards the value of 0.357703307442 as well as matching the values of integration in the last two rows when and by using the two methods R(MSM) and R(SMM).…”
Section: From Table (2): Whenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Aljassas [10] introduced a numerical method () RM RMM to calculating triple integrals with continuous integrands by using Romberg acceleration with Mid-point rule on the three dimensions when the number of divisions on the interior dimension is equal to the number of divisions on the middle dimension, but both of them are deferent from the number of divisions on the exterior dimension and she got a high accuracy in the results in a little sub-intervals relatively and a short time. Also in 2015, Sarada et al [9] use the generalized Gaussian Quadrature to evaluate triple integral and got a good results. In this research we presented two theories with their proves to derive two new numerical methods to evaluate the triple integrals with continuous integrands and their correction terms, this two methods product from applied two rules of Newton-Cotes (Mid-point and Simpson) the first method by using Mid-point rule on the interior dimension X, Simpson's rule on the middle dimension Y and Mid-point rule on the exterior dimension Z, the second method by using Mid-point rule on both two dimensions of interior X and middle Y, while Simpson's rule used on the exterior dimension Z which denoted by symbols MSM and SMM respectively with the same number of divisions on the three dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%