2020
DOI: 10.3233/jifs-179463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general approach to fuzzy TOPSIS based on the concept of fuzzy multicriteria acceptability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the different multi-criteria decision-making methods that incorporate fuzzy variables, the FTOPSIS method developed by Hwang and Yoon (1981) is considered one of the most widely used (Yatsalo et al, 2020). Its importance lies in the fact that it allows optimising decision making to rank performance by similarity to the ideal solution (ranking method) as collaborative decision makers (Parida, 2020).…”
Section: Ftopsis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different multi-criteria decision-making methods that incorporate fuzzy variables, the FTOPSIS method developed by Hwang and Yoon (1981) is considered one of the most widely used (Yatsalo et al, 2020). Its importance lies in the fact that it allows optimising decision making to rank performance by similarity to the ideal solution (ranking method) as collaborative decision makers (Parida, 2020).…”
Section: Ftopsis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Wu et al [32] proposed a method based on TOPSIS and MCS for the classification of rock masses under uncertainty, while Yatsalo et al [33] introduced a novel fuzzy extension of the TOPSIS method and implemented the Fuzzy Multi-criteria Acceptability Analysis (FMAA) concept within it, while they used MCS to compare the Fuzzy TOPSIS and FMAA models. Moreover, Chen et al [34] proposed a method for evaluating slope stability results based on TOPSIS and Monte Carlo Simulation, and Jun et al [35] ranked alternative scenarios with TOPSIS while introducing a framework for measuring the innovation capacities of financial institutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%