2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general assay for monitoring the activities of protein tyrosine phosphatases in living eukaryotic cells

Abstract: Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are key signal-transduction regulators and have emerged as potential drug targets for inhibitor design. Here we report a yeast-based assay that provides a general means of assessing the activity and/or inhibition of essentially any classical PTP in living cells. The assay uses the activity of an exogenously expressed PTP to counter the activity of a co-expressed and toxic tyrosine kinase, such that only active PTPs are capable of rescuing growth. PTP activity gives rise to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early indications of heterologous PTK activity in yeast were observed through growth inhibition upon overexpression of v-SRC, later explained by aberrant phosphorylation of yeast proteins (Brugge et al, 1987;Kornbluth et al, 1987;Cooper and MacAuley, 1988;Florio et al, 1994). The toxic effect of PTK activity upon overproduction in yeast was exploited for screening of kinase inhibitors or phosphatases which restore yeast growth (Montalibet and Kennedy, 2004;Koyama et al, 2006;Harris et al, 2013). Despite these overexpression toxicity issues, Nada and colleagues (Nada et al, 1991) effectively used a heterologous yeast system to discover that CSK negatively regulates SRC by C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early indications of heterologous PTK activity in yeast were observed through growth inhibition upon overexpression of v-SRC, later explained by aberrant phosphorylation of yeast proteins (Brugge et al, 1987;Kornbluth et al, 1987;Cooper and MacAuley, 1988;Florio et al, 1994). The toxic effect of PTK activity upon overproduction in yeast was exploited for screening of kinase inhibitors or phosphatases which restore yeast growth (Montalibet and Kennedy, 2004;Koyama et al, 2006;Harris et al, 2013). Despite these overexpression toxicity issues, Nada and colleagues (Nada et al, 1991) effectively used a heterologous yeast system to discover that CSK negatively regulates SRC by C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxic effect of tyrosine kinase activity in yeast can be leveraged to study kinase activity perturbations, and as such was exploited for screening of inhibitors of kinase or phosphatases which restore yeast growth [41][42][43]. Similar to the co-expression of repressive CSK kinase in the presence of SRC [34], co-expression of the catalytical domain of PTP1B tyrosine phosphatase can rescue v-SRC tyrosine kinase growth phenotype.…”
Section: Assaying Tyrosine Phosphorylation In Yeastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tumor suppressor p53 is one of the most frequent mutated proteins in cancer, and also one of the most intensively studied proteins. S. cerevisiae lacks a p53 homolog and expression of the human protein results in a decreased growth rate [43,[106][107][108][109]. Nigro et al showed that the expression of p53 in yeast increased the doubling time up to 250% compared to empty vector control or the expression of an inactive mutant version of p53 [108].…”
Section: The P53 Tumor Suppressor Protein In Yeastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PTP-1B functions as a negative regulator of insulin and as a drug target in order to ameliorate resistance to the hormone [26]. For the screening of the MNP library, we used an enzymatic assay for the inhibition of the recombinant human PTP-1B protein together with the T Cell-PTP counter screen assay to check for enzymatic specificity [27]. We also tested 50 µg/mL extracts or fractions of the MNP library, and inhibition was calculated by comparing measurements with controls (no treatment).…”
Section: Antidiabetic Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 99%