1951
DOI: 10.1029/tr032i002p00231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general formula for hydrologic frequency analysis

Abstract: A general formula is presented to simplify many existing methods of hydrologic frequency analysis. It is shown that the methods differ only in the definition of the frequency factor contained in the formula. The derivation of the formula is simple, and does not require familiarity with advanced mathematics and statistics. The application of the formula is practical so that it provides a valuable tool for the hydrologic design of hydraulic structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
10

Year Published

1961
1961
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
89
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Design storm is a storm event of specific duration and return period used to calculate the runoff volume and peak discharge, for designing hydrology-related measures in engineering. Observed hourly precipitation is used to derive the design storm by frequency analysis [36] and hyetograph analysis [37]. The design storm is the input of flood analysis in assessing current flood risk.…”
Section: Risk Assessment and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design storm is a storm event of specific duration and return period used to calculate the runoff volume and peak discharge, for designing hydrology-related measures in engineering. Observed hourly precipitation is used to derive the design storm by frequency analysis [36] and hyetograph analysis [37]. The design storm is the input of flood analysis in assessing current flood risk.…”
Section: Risk Assessment and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a theoretically convenient probability distribution function (PDF) is fitted to empirical histograms in order to obtain the population distribution of the rainfall amounts. Similar studies have been considered by many researchers in the literature, such as Gregory (1957), Colling (1961), Chow (1964), Jackson (1969), Taylor & Lawes (1971), Canterford & Pierrehumert (1977), Fiddes (1977), Martin (1988), Abouammoh (1991) and Wallis & Hosking (1993). The main purpose of this paper is to identify the most suitable probability distribution function for the monthly rainfall records all over the study area in Libya.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The two storms were based on statistical analysis of the historical rainfall data from the Ministry of Environment, Water, and Agriculture rain gauge with a record starting from 1979. The 24-h rainfall accumulations for the 5-year and 100-year, 24-h storms were found to be 31 mm and 73 mm, respectively, using Log-Pearson Type III distribution (LPT III) [48]. Due to the size of the catchment, an area-reduction factor of 0.8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%