2017
DOI: 10.3390/risks5040065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Framework for Incorporating Stochastic Recovery in Structural Models of Credit Risk

Abstract: Abstract:In this work, we introduce a general framework for incorporating stochastic recovery into structural models. The framework extends the approach to recovery modeling developed in Costanzino (2015, 2017) and provides for a systematic way to include different recovery processes into a structural credit model. The key observation is a connection between the partial information gap between firm manager and the market that is captured via a distortion of the probability of default. This last feature is comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out in Szegö (2002) , current market conditions call for the need for a complex and thorough modeling set-ups to provide proper support to the regulators for the design of quantitative policies. However, most of the previous works have separated the study of the CCR ( Brigo and Tarenghi, 2005 ;Brigo and Bakkar, 2009;Lipton and Sepp, 2009;Bielecki et al, 2011;Arora et al, 2012;Albanese et al, 2013;Brigo et al, 2013;Ballotta and Fusai, 2015;Bo and Capponi, 2015;Kim and Leung, 2016;Cohen and Costanzino, 2017;Ballotta et al, 2019;Li and Zhang, 2019 ) to that of stochastic recovery rates ( Chiang and Tsai, 2010;Amraoui et al, 2012;Schläfer and Uhrig-Homburg, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out in Szegö (2002) , current market conditions call for the need for a complex and thorough modeling set-ups to provide proper support to the regulators for the design of quantitative policies. However, most of the previous works have separated the study of the CCR ( Brigo and Tarenghi, 2005 ;Brigo and Bakkar, 2009;Lipton and Sepp, 2009;Bielecki et al, 2011;Arora et al, 2012;Albanese et al, 2013;Brigo et al, 2013;Ballotta and Fusai, 2015;Bo and Capponi, 2015;Kim and Leung, 2016;Cohen and Costanzino, 2017;Ballotta et al, 2019;Li and Zhang, 2019 ) to that of stochastic recovery rates ( Chiang and Tsai, 2010;Amraoui et al, 2012;Schläfer and Uhrig-Homburg, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%