2017
DOI: 10.15447/sfews.2017v15iss1art8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Framework for Setting Quantitative Population Objectives for Wildlife Conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some major bird groups, quantitative conservation objectives have not yet been defined. Thus, although the bird conservation objectives described here will likely require updating as new information becomes available, they still provide a sense of the magnitude of the conservation challenge at hand (Dybala et al 2017c). These objectives can be readily incorporated into conservation planning and restoration goals in the Delta, and existing restoration projects can make important contributions toward meeting these objectives.…”
Section: Additional At-risk Species and Habitat Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some major bird groups, quantitative conservation objectives have not yet been defined. Thus, although the bird conservation objectives described here will likely require updating as new information becomes available, they still provide a sense of the magnitude of the conservation challenge at hand (Dybala et al 2017c). These objectives can be readily incorporated into conservation planning and restoration goals in the Delta, and existing restoration projects can make important contributions toward meeting these objectives.…”
Section: Additional At-risk Species and Habitat Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term population objectives are based on general hypotheses for the orders of magnitude required to achieve genetically robust, self-sustaining, and resilient populations (Dybala et al 2017, this volume; Table 2). They are based on principles of conservation biology and are derived from the best available data, but may require revision if new species-or population-specific information becomes available ( Figure 1E).…”
Section: March 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, two modifiers indicate populations that are "steeply declining" or "resilient." Steeply declining populations are at high risk of extirpation or extinction regardless of population size, whereas resilient populations have multiple self-sustaining sub-populations in the planning area to guard against environmental catastrophes in one part of the range (see Dybala et al 2017, this volume, for more information). We applied this framework to each focal species population in each focus area, and we…”
Section: Central Valley Grassland and Oak Savannah Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%