2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general framework for the evaluation of shock-capturing schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TVD schemes are oscillation-free in one-dimensional simulations, and thus we would like to use the minmod (MM) limiter and superbee (SB) limiter, which are respectively the most and least restrictive second-order TVD schemes [11], as the baseline schemes to show the different behaviours of high-order schemes. ENO/WENO schemes, however, can not guarantee providing oscillation-free shock-capturing results, and Zhao et al [8] proved that the amplitude of the oscillation relates to the frequency of the smooth disturbance interacting with the discontinuity. Zhao et al [8] also indicated that the activation of linearly unstable stencils might contribute to the resulting exaggerated amplitude or overshoot of propagating smooth waves near the discontinuity.…”
Section: Shock-capturing Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TVD schemes are oscillation-free in one-dimensional simulations, and thus we would like to use the minmod (MM) limiter and superbee (SB) limiter, which are respectively the most and least restrictive second-order TVD schemes [11], as the baseline schemes to show the different behaviours of high-order schemes. ENO/WENO schemes, however, can not guarantee providing oscillation-free shock-capturing results, and Zhao et al [8] proved that the amplitude of the oscillation relates to the frequency of the smooth disturbance interacting with the discontinuity. Zhao et al [8] also indicated that the activation of linearly unstable stencils might contribute to the resulting exaggerated amplitude or overshoot of propagating smooth waves near the discontinuity.…”
Section: Shock-capturing Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we are interested in the behaviour of simulating multiple closely located shock waves, which was not given in Ref. [8]. Another fundamental property needs to be justified is the relative magnitude of the overshoots produced by the shock-capturing schemes at discontinuities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous subsection provides the results showing the performance of resolving smooth waves. Here, the shock-capturing error analysis method 21 is implemented to examine the performance of capturing discontinuous solutions. In this scalar model problem, sinusoidal disturbances linearly propagate from the left to the right, and in the middle of the scalar field there is an abrupt change of the speed of sound, causing a fixed discontinuity.…”
Section: Shock-capturing Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al 21 proposed a standard metric to evaluate the overall performance of high-order finite difference schemes, with taking the computational efficiency into account. Since the seventh-order WENO scheme requires almost 50% more CPU time than the fifth-order WENO scheme 21 while approximating the numerical flux at a given grid point, higher-order schemes may need similar CPU time as that of the fifth-order scheme, for achieving moderate numerical error on (relatively) coarser meshes. Of course, if high accuracy is expected on fine meshes, higher-order schemes still are the more suitable choice since they converge faster than lower-order schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconstruction scheme of Suresh and Huynh has been tested against the classical weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO5) scheme by Scandaliato and Liou (2012), where it proved to be more efficient and more accurate. Both of the reconstruction schemes have also been tested in a publication by Zhao et al (2019) addressing the wave propagation errors of smooth waves, when interacting with discontinuities, where the MP5 scheme turned out to be a good compromise regarding wave propagation errors and was slightly more efficient than other schemes with a formal accuracy of 5th order. Further publications have dealt with the properties and defects of shock-capturing schemes.…”
Section: Codementioning
confidence: 99%