2010
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general method for controlling the genome-wide type I error rate in linkage and association mapping experiments in plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…65. Alternatively, simulation-based approaches have been proposed for LMMs 57,58 . Provided that effects of independent noise and population structure can be correctly estimated from the data, these methods might help to further improve statistical power/runtime as compared with permutation-based approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65. Alternatively, simulation-based approaches have been proposed for LMMs 57,58 . Provided that effects of independent noise and population structure can be correctly estimated from the data, these methods might help to further improve statistical power/runtime as compared with permutation-based approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is from this test that the statistical significance of a fixed marker effect is obtained. However, the high computational cost of permutation and its inability to account for familial relatedness appropriately (Muller et al 2011) renders it unsuitable for managing false positives in genome-wide association studies. If the p values are not adjusted correctly for multiple testing, the type I error rate becomes inflated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have considered the issue of multiple testing and have sought ways to address it in genetic studies [5257]. One solution is to determine the “true” number of independent SNPs, so that the multiple testing correction is not as egregious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%