A comparative study of the impact of small, medium-sized,
and bulky
α,β-dehydroamino acids (ΔAAs) on the structure and
stability of Balaram’s incipient 310-helical peptide
(1) is reported. Replacement of the N-terminal Aib residue of 1 with a ΔAA afforded
peptides 2a–c that maintained the
310-helical shape of 1. In contrast, installation
of a ΔAA in place of Aib-3 yielded peptides 3a–c that preferred a β-sheet-like conformation. The impact
of the ΔAA on peptide structure was independent of size, with
small (ΔAla), medium-sized (Z-ΔAbu),
and bulky (ΔVal) ΔAAs exerting similar effects. The proteolytic
stabilities of 1 and its analogs were determined by incubation
with Pronase. Z-ΔAbu and ΔVal increased the resistance
of peptides to proteolysis when incorporated at the 3-position and
had negligible impact on stability when placed at the 1-position,
whereas ΔAla-containing peptides degraded rapidly regardless
of position. Exposure of peptides 2a–c and 3a–c to the reactive thiol
cysteamine revealed that ΔAla-containing peptides underwent
conjugate addition at room temperature, while Z-ΔAbu-
and ΔVal-containing peptides were inert even at elevated temperatures.
These results suggest that both bulky and more accessible medium-sized
ΔAAs should be valuable tools for bestowing rigidity and proteolytic
stability on bioactive peptides.