2004
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general method of parameterizing the big‐leaf model to predict the dry‐canopy evaporation rate of individual coniferous forest stands

Abstract: Abstract:This study proposes a general method of parameterizing the big-leaf model that is applicable to estimation of daytime dry-canopy evaporation (hereafter, evaporation) rates of coniferous forest stands without observed flux data. The method considers variation in the reference value of surface conductance G s between individual stands by incorporating a relationship between canopy height and reference G s values reported by Komatsu (2003c) [Hydrological Processes 17: 2503-2512. However, the method doe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
4
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Swank and Douglass 1974 2. Langford 1976Langford 89 5 2007Langford 1981Langford , 1993199210 Kelliher et al, 1990, 1992Lee and Black, 1993;Barr et al, 1994 1 1 Swanson andWhitfi eld, 1981;Granier, 1987;Swanson, 1994Granier et al, 1990, 1992Hatton and Vertessy, 1990;Cienciala et al, 1994 a, b Hatton and Vertessy, 1990;Kostner et al, 1992;Berbigier et al, 19963 19951995Lane and Mackey, 20012004;2003Brown et al, 2005;Farley et al, 2005Farley et al, 2005Farley et al, 1995 Granier et al., 1996a, b, 2000bBlanken et al, 1997Blanken et al, , 2001Kumagai et al, 2004bKumagai et al, , 2005bKumagai et al, 1996Kumagai et al, , 1998Saigusa et al, 2002;2002Granier et al, 2000aWilson et al, 2002Wilson et al, , 20032003;Komatsu, 2003, 20041 Schmid et al, 2000Berbigier et al, 2001;…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Swank and Douglass 1974 2. Langford 1976Langford 89 5 2007Langford 1981Langford , 1993199210 Kelliher et al, 1990, 1992Lee and Black, 1993;Barr et al, 1994 1 1 Swanson andWhitfi eld, 1981;Granier, 1987;Swanson, 1994Granier et al, 1990, 1992Hatton and Vertessy, 1990;Cienciala et al, 1994 a, b Hatton and Vertessy, 1990;Kostner et al, 1992;Berbigier et al, 19963 19951995Lane and Mackey, 20012004;2003Brown et al, 2005;Farley et al, 2005Farley et al, 2005Farley et al, 1995 Granier et al., 1996a, b, 2000bBlanken et al, 1997Blanken et al, , 2001Kumagai et al, 2004bKumagai et al, , 2005bKumagai et al, 1996Kumagai et al, , 1998Saigusa et al, 2002;2002Granier et al, 2000aWilson et al, 2002Wilson et al, , 20032003;Komatsu, 2003, 20041 Schmid et al, 2000Berbigier et al, 2001;…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Langford 1976 1 Vertessy et al Vertessy et al Hatton and Vertessy 1990Vertessy et al 1995, 1997Vertessy et al, 2001 Haydon et al Komatsu et al Helvey and Patric, 1965;Helvey, 1967;Swank et al, 1972Komatsu et al 2001Lieberman and Hoover, 1951Pechanec, 1957 Komatsu Landsberg and Gower, 1997;Waring and Running, 1998;2002 FOREST-BGC Running and Coughlan, 1988;McMurtrie et al, 1990McMurtrie et al, , 1992Gower, 1991 Granier et al, 1999;Murakami et al, 2000;Kumagai et al, 2004aKumagai et al, 3 3 198819982007;2007Morikawa et al 1986Morikawa et al 1986196040 20 Murakami et al, 20002003;Komatsu et al, 2007a20 Komatsu, 2003, 2004 …”
Section: Vertessy Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we presume that this increase would not be considerable. Variations in the relationship between S and G c cause slight differences in E for forests at daily or longer time-scales (Komatsu, 2004). Indeed, most studies examining changes in E due to thinning at these scales did not observe evidence of an increase in E due to the improved light-environment by thinning (Whitehead and Kelliher, 1991;Lagergren et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest evapotranspiration usually depends on vapour pressure deficit rather than incident radiation because forest canopies are aerodynamically rough (McNaughton and Black, 1973;Jarvis and McNaughton, 1986;Komatsu, 2003Komatsu, , 2004. Despite this, assuming that E / E eq is reasonable because the vapour pressure deficit relates to incident radiation due to planetary boundary layer feedback (De Bruin, 1983;McNaughton, 1989;Raupach, 1998).…”
Section: Errors Associated With the Assumption Of E D E Eqmentioning
confidence: 99%