1997
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general method to design dominant negatives to B-HLHZip proteins that abolish DNA binding

Abstract: We describe a method to design dominantnegative proteins (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
71
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analysis, expression of the A-Mitf dominantnegative mutant, which should have prevented DNA binding by TFE3-related proteins (Krylov et al, 1997), had little effect on CDK4 expression in normal or breast cancer cell lines (data not shown). This result would exclude a major involvement of the TFE3 family in these cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our analysis, expression of the A-Mitf dominantnegative mutant, which should have prevented DNA binding by TFE3-related proteins (Krylov et al, 1997), had little effect on CDK4 expression in normal or breast cancer cell lines (data not shown). This result would exclude a major involvement of the TFE3 family in these cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The A-USF and A-Max constructs were chosen for this analysis because of their specificity and efficiency in inhibiting the DNA-binding activity of proteins of the USF or Myc family, respectively (Krylov et al, 1997;Qyang et al, 1999). A nearly fivefold decrease in the activity of the CDK4 promoter was observed in the presence of cotransfected A-USF, indicating an essential role of endogenous USF…”
Section: Functional Importance Of the Cdk4 E Boxes In Nontumorigenic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we have decided to follow a dierent strategy, that consists in the design, by molecular modelling, of a new protein domain which acts from within, by altering the balance among dierent factors of one of these networks, the Max network. Naturally occurring dominant negative mutations in bHLHZip proteins, like those in the Mi gene (Moore, 1995), as well as previously designed dominant mutations (Krylov et al, 1997) aect the function of the basic region, thus abolishing DNA binding. Our target was instead protein dimerization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether these endogenous proteins were USF itself, we cotransfected expression vectors encoding mutants with dominant negative e ect on the activity of the USF or, as a control, the Myc family of transcription factors. A-USF and A-Max are constructs in which the basic region of USF1 or Max, respectively, was replaced by an acidic sequence (Qyang et al, 1999;Krylov et al, 1997). This substitution greatly stabilizes heterodimer formation between the wild-type and mutant proteins.…”
Section: Transcriptional Activity Of Usf In a Non-tumorigenic Breast mentioning
confidence: 99%