2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05149-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Method to Evaluate the Correlation of Randomness Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies [23,24] showed that the correlation between the frequency and matrix tests is R = 0.025 < 0.2, showing some dependency or relevance. Therefore, the method of combining the frequency and matrix tests not only will not affect the correlation of test results, but also will make the test more convincing and more efficient.…”
Section: Randomness Tests Methods Of Zigbee Protocol Based On the Mmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous studies [23,24] showed that the correlation between the frequency and matrix tests is R = 0.025 < 0.2, showing some dependency or relevance. Therefore, the method of combining the frequency and matrix tests not only will not affect the correlation of test results, but also will make the test more convincing and more efficient.…”
Section: Randomness Tests Methods Of Zigbee Protocol Based On the Mmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a similar way, correlation is defined by examining at the distribution of a test's results in the region where the other test's results are lower than 0.01 [11]. Another method is defined by Fan et al [12]. In this method, firstly P-values are calculated by using two different sets.…”
Section: Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang and Lai [13] used the conditional entropy to construct a quantitative value for comparing the tests and proposed a basic method on how to determine the tests' optimal execution order. In [14], Fan et al gave a general hypothesis testing method to evaluate the correlation of statistical tests. And in [15], Sulak et al defined the coverage efficiency of a test suite which is used to determine the most efficient, the least efficient, and the optimal subsuites of the NIST SP800-22 test suite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the DFT computation is time-consuming and the time complexity is nonlinear, the test time will significantly increase along with the sequence length and the sequence number, which is unsuitable for some practical application scenarios, such as fast test of very long sequences on ordinary computers. Although the studies [13][14][15] for test items' correlations could reduce the test time by appropriately selecting partial test items, instead of performing the whole test items, they cannot fundamentally improve the test efficiency of any specific test item, including the DFT test. Third, the DFT algorithm requires high memory consumptions, previous DFT test methods have a high possibility to crash for long sequence test, due to the memory limitations of ordinary computers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%