“…These authors argue that changes in host use are due to changes in overall threshold for acceptage of any host, and that changes in rank order preference are not expected. Contrary to our results, 2 studies (Harrison, 1987;Prokopy et al, 1988) Although some theoretical analyses predict that genetic correlation between preference and performance could be responsible for the maintenance of genetic variation in habitat selection (Bush, 1974; but see review in Jaenike and Holt, 1991), it is well known that genetic variation in preference may exist without correlated variation in performance and vice versa (eg, Gould, 1979;Wasserman and Futuyma, 1981;Tabashnik, 1983;Futuyma and Moreno, 1988 (Courtney et al, 1989 (Tuci6 et al, 1990) and Drosophila populations (Roff and Mousseau, 1987;Tuci6 et al 1988) and which appears to contradict Fisher's (1930) (Wasserman and Futuyma, 1981) showed that a population that had been selected for female oviposition preference on a given host species displayed the same preference for this host after the selection as a population that had been maintained without choice on the same host. These findings are in agreement with our observation for the no-choice and choice Cicer lines (table I).…”