2016
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general model framework for multisymbol number comparison.

Abstract: Different models have been proposed for the processing of multisymbol numbers like two- and three-digit numbers but also for negative numbers and decimals. However, these multisymbol numbers are assembled from the same set of Arabic digits and comply with the place-value structure of the Arabic number system. Considering these shared properties, we suggest that the processing of multisymbol numbers can be described in one general model framework. Accordingly, we first developed a computational model framework … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
91
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
13
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of advantages for componential processing for fractions would be consistent with evidence that other types of multi‐digit numbers (e.g., multi‐digit integers) are typically processed in a componential fashion (e.g., Huber, Moeller, Nuerk, & Willmes, ; Huber, Nuerk, Willmes, & Moeller, ). In this study, we explored the potential benefits of componential fraction processing, focusing on a task that requires arithmetic computations (rather than comparison of numbers to perceptual displays, as in DeWolf et al., 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The existence of advantages for componential processing for fractions would be consistent with evidence that other types of multi‐digit numbers (e.g., multi‐digit integers) are typically processed in a componential fashion (e.g., Huber, Moeller, Nuerk, & Willmes, ; Huber, Nuerk, Willmes, & Moeller, ). In this study, we explored the potential benefits of componential fraction processing, focusing on a task that requires arithmetic computations (rather than comparison of numbers to perceptual displays, as in DeWolf et al., 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…One proposed explanation for that effect is that under certain conditions, the holistic analog magnitude that is encoded when we convert from number symbols becomes anchored on the leftmost digit (Thomas & Morwitz, , ). Alternatively, models of number representation that assume decomposed rather than holistic processing can also explain the LDE (Huber, Nuerk, Willmes, & Moeller, ). Support for decomposed processing of multidigit numbers, rather than analog magnitude representations that encompass the holistic magnitudes of single‐digit and multi‐digit numbers, comes from tasks like two‐digit number comparisons using pairs of numbers that are either unit‐decade compatible (e.g., 42 and 57) or unit‐decade incompatible (e.g., 47 and 62), while overall absolute distance for each pair is held constant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, because we observed distractor effects, the current data suggest that the children did not only compute the result, but also processed the distractors. It is possible that estimation occurred for the decomposed processing of units and decades (for reviews, see Nuerk et al ., , ; Nuerk & Willmes, ; for a computational model, see Huber, Nuerk, Willmes, & Moeller, ). In this case, the processing of a distractor differing at the decade position should be slower than the processing of a distractor differing at the unit position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%