2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general procedure for detector–response correction of higher order cumulants

Abstract: We propose a general procedure for the detector-response correction (including efficiency correction) of higher order cumulants observed by the event-by-event analysis in heavy-ion collisions. This method makes use of the moments of the response matrix characterizing the property of a detector, and is applicable to a wide variety of response matrices such as those having non-binomial responses and including the effects of ghost tracks. A procedure to carry out the detector-response correction of realistic dete… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some analytical formulas have been proposed to correct the measured cumulants with the assumption that the response function of the efficiency follows the binomial distribution [14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Recently, a few attempts to understand and correct for the possible non-binomial efficiencies have been discussed [11,23,24], but there are still large systematic uncertainties arising from how to determine the detector-response functions. The efficiency correction with the binomial assumption is thus still important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some analytical formulas have been proposed to correct the measured cumulants with the assumption that the response function of the efficiency follows the binomial distribution [14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Recently, a few attempts to understand and correct for the possible non-binomial efficiencies have been discussed [11,23,24], but there are still large systematic uncertainties arising from how to determine the detector-response functions. The efficiency correction with the binomial assumption is thus still important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 24). The red symbols correspond to the "standard" efficiency correction (13), which is applicable only for the case of non-overlapping particles. The horizontal dashed line corresponds to the true value of Σ 1,1 Np,Q + / Np = 1.1.…”
Section: A Poisson Distributed Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [9]). However, if W D (n, N ) can be approximated by a binomial distribution -a reasonably good approximation in a number of cases (see [10,11]) -the relevant formulas for the efficiency corrections of cumulants can and have been derived [6,7,12,13]. However, certain subtleties arise when efficiency corrections are performed for off-diagonal cumulants, such as the correlation of net-proton or net-kaon number with the net-charge number.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible method is moment expansion proposed in Ref. [20], where detectorresponse matrices are utilized to correct cumulants. In addition, experimental attempts are ongoing to get cumulants corrected for possible non-binomial effects by reconstructing distribution itself [7,21].…”
Section: • Detector Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%