2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2017.2700272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General-Purpose Architecture for Replicated Metadata Services in Distributed File Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all these adaptation mechanisms, the newly assigned read-serving replicas (although consistent at the level of persisted data) may have missed recent reads and thus have an outdated memory cache leading to a performance impact (Section 4). Empirical evidence of the challenge addressed in this paper (and inspiration for this work) is provided by our own previous research [22], [23], [32]. Figure 1 (from [22]) demonstrates that the action of changing the primary replica can hide the performance impact of a backup task, however the improved system (Figure 1b) still suffers from a smaller but non-negligible performance hit (area in red circle) due to cold-cache misses at the new primary (a previously non-read-serving replica).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all these adaptation mechanisms, the newly assigned read-serving replicas (although consistent at the level of persisted data) may have missed recent reads and thus have an outdated memory cache leading to a performance impact (Section 4). Empirical evidence of the challenge addressed in this paper (and inspiration for this work) is provided by our own previous research [22], [23], [32]. Figure 1 (from [22]) demonstrates that the action of changing the primary replica can hide the performance impact of a backup task, however the improved system (Figure 1b) still suffers from a smaller but non-negligible performance hit (area in red circle) due to cold-cache misses at the new primary (a previously non-read-serving replica).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 (from [22]) demonstrates that the action of changing the primary replica can hide the performance impact of a backup task, however the improved system (Figure 1b) still suffers from a smaller but non-negligible performance hit (area in red circle) due to cold-cache misses at the new primary (a previously non-read-serving replica). Other work on measuring the recovery time of a replicated version of the HDFS metadata server [32] ( §4.4.3) showed that switching the primary to a new replica with a cold memory cache can lead to significantly higher time to recover compared to a version switching to a hot spare.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, Stamatakis et al [9] proposed a generalpurpose architecture for High Availability Metadata Services. Metadata is one of the most important components of distributed file system.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%