2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-020-02078-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Semi-Theoretical Model for Conical Picks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the traditional rock breaking mode of continuous coal and rock, the cutting force required for breaking limestone is 29.4 kN when the cutting depth is 9 mm. According to [32], the ratio of peak cutting force to mean cutting force is 2.45 kN. e peak cutting force for limestone cutting should be 72.03 kN, which is far greater than that of 5.646 kN when the granite thickness is 30 mm.…”
Section: Advantages Of the Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the traditional rock breaking mode of continuous coal and rock, the cutting force required for breaking limestone is 29.4 kN when the cutting depth is 9 mm. According to [32], the ratio of peak cutting force to mean cutting force is 2.45 kN. e peak cutting force for limestone cutting should be 72.03 kN, which is far greater than that of 5.646 kN when the granite thickness is 30 mm.…”
Section: Advantages Of the Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors of [6] introduced a theoretical-empirical cutting approach, where the interaction between the rock and the cutting tool is highlighted in a zero-degree angle cutting scenario. In the study [7], a detailed comparative analysis of the cutting force was conducted in the case of conical pick cutting mechanisms, based on nearly 200 test results of several different rock materials. Numerous studies using linear cutting machines (LCM) were conducted to evaluate parameters of excavating machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and Su [15] point out that the maximum volume of rock fragment is proportional to cutting depth and that the specific energy decreases exponentially with the increase of cutting depth. Yasar [16,17] points out that there are inherent defects in the traditional theoretical model. Test results of different rocks show that semitheoretical model of rock cutting can better reflect the actual situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%