2002
DOI: 10.1177/004728702237412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Theory of Tourism Consumption Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Empirical Exploration

Abstract: A tourism consumption system (TCS) is defined as the set of related travel thoughts, decisions, and behaviors by a discretionary traveler prior to, during, and following a trip. The central proposition of a theory of TCS is that the thoughts, decisions, and behaviors regarding one activity influence the thoughts, decisions, and behaviors for a number of other activities. Using exit interview travel data and quick clustering analysis, this article empirically examines seven basic TCS propositions pertaining to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
155
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
155
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The conative component of destination image represents tourists' active consideration of a place as a potential travel destination (Gartner, 1993). Although conative destination image has been considered by many scholars as synonymous to intention (King et al, 2015;Pike & Ryan, 2004;Prayag, 2009;Woodside & Dubelaar, 2002), representing how and why knowledge and feelings of new or repeat visitors contribute to the selection of a specific destination for vacations (Pike & Ryan, 2004;, there is evidence that conative destination images and intentions are distinct constructs (Perugini & Bagozzi, 2004;Prestwich et al, 2008;White, 2014). Hence, destination image theory suggests that cognitive and affective images represent individuals' subjective associations or perceptions related to a destination's characteristics (Chen & Uysal, 2002;Gartner, 1993;Kim & Richardson, 2003) and conative image outlines the idealized and desired future situation the individual wants to develop for himself/herself (Dann, 1996).…”
Section: Destination Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conative component of destination image represents tourists' active consideration of a place as a potential travel destination (Gartner, 1993). Although conative destination image has been considered by many scholars as synonymous to intention (King et al, 2015;Pike & Ryan, 2004;Prayag, 2009;Woodside & Dubelaar, 2002), representing how and why knowledge and feelings of new or repeat visitors contribute to the selection of a specific destination for vacations (Pike & Ryan, 2004;, there is evidence that conative destination images and intentions are distinct constructs (Perugini & Bagozzi, 2004;Prestwich et al, 2008;White, 2014). Hence, destination image theory suggests that cognitive and affective images represent individuals' subjective associations or perceptions related to a destination's characteristics (Chen & Uysal, 2002;Gartner, 1993;Kim & Richardson, 2003) and conative image outlines the idealized and desired future situation the individual wants to develop for himself/herself (Dann, 1996).…”
Section: Destination Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it would be interesting to test the validity of Woodside and Dubelaar's (2002) proposition that planned and realized attraction visits play an a priori role as stimuli that are antecedent to tourism behavior. This is quite important, particularly when data collection for the current study coincided with the staging of two major slavery events, i.e., the Pan-African Historical Theatre Festival (PANAFEST) and Emancipation Day celebrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Cave and Brown (2012) (Ioannides, 2008), environmental audit (Diamantis& Westlake, 1997) on the Greek island of Mytilini; destination knowledge mapping in Korea (Pyo, 2005); the tourism consumption system (Woodside & Dubelaar, 2002); integrated technical economic modelling (Xu et al, 2003); and systems approaches that encompass multiple social, economic, cultural, and environmental dimensions (Carlsen, 1999;Northcote & Macbeth, 2006). These models are obviously underpinned by an awareness that tourism deals with finite-rather than infinitely renewable-markets and resources, leading to the need for sustainable approaches in the management of island destinations (Dodds, 2007).…”
Section: Destination Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%