1976
DOI: 10.2307/1426023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalization of Goldstein's comparison lemma and the exponential limit law in critical Crump-Mode-Jagers branching processes

Abstract: Let Z(t) be the population size at time t in a general age-dependent branching process (as defined by Crump and Mode, or Jagers) in which the number N of offspring of a parent has expected value 1 (critical case). Assuming positivity and finiteness of the second moments of N, of the lifespan distribution and of the expected number of births per parent as a function of age (also assumed to be strongly non-lattice), the distribution of Z(t)/t conditioned on non-extinction at time t is asymptotically exponential.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1977
1977
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proof is quite different from that of Holte (1976). His argument is a strengthening of that of Goldstein (1971) for the Bellman-Harris process involving a comparison with the Galton-Watson process governed by the same family-size distribution.…”
Section: (O T)~2contrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our proof is quite different from that of Holte (1976). His argument is a strengthening of that of Goldstein (1971) for the Bellman-Harris process involving a comparison with the Galton-Watson process governed by the same family-size distribution.…”
Section: (O T)~2contrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In the subcritical case, the finiteness and the value of the expectation of the limit law was not known, except for the Bellman-Harris process. In the critical case, the exponential limit was obtained by Durham (1971) under the condition that all moments of~(oo) are finite, and by Holte (1976), who required an unnatural assumption on the rate of convergence of E(Z(t» to (3-1f tL(dt).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation