1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01768484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalization of leftmost derivations

Abstract: Abstract.A generalization of leftmost derivation called depth-first derivation is defined. The main result, that the depth-first derivations of an arbitrary phrase-structure grammar generate a context-free language, is proved using a new technique in which families of equivalent depth-first derivations of one grammar are represented by single productions in a new grammar. This result is related to several others, including an analogous result for leftmost derivations, through the theorem of B. Baker [1] that e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous paper [14], the concept of leftmost derivation was extended to depth-first derivation, and a result of Evey [4], that the leftmost derivations of an arbitrary phrase-structure grammar generate a context-free language, was generalized to depth-first derivations. In this paper, we investigate the interaction of depth-first derivations with control sets on grammars, which have been studied by numerous investigators [1-3, 5-8, 10, 12, 13, 15-19] using leftmost or arbitrary derivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous paper [14], the concept of leftmost derivation was extended to depth-first derivation, and a result of Evey [4], that the leftmost derivations of an arbitrary phrase-structure grammar generate a context-free language, was generalized to depth-first derivations. In this paper, we investigate the interaction of depth-first derivations with control sets on grammars, which have been studied by numerous investigators [1-3, 5-8, 10, 12, 13, 15-19] using leftmost or arbitrary derivations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%