2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10474-013-0296-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalization of the Goldston–Pintz–Yildirim prime gaps result to number fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact and by implication Lemma 3 seem to be well known (see e.g. [10] or [3]), but we indicate the proof below.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fact and by implication Lemma 3 seem to be well known (see e.g. [10] or [3]), but we indicate the proof below.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…), and so using Proposition 1 and the subsequent evaluation (10) to keep track of E K (X; H) asymptotically, the above simplifies to…”
Section: Primes In Short Intervals: a Heuristic Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a major misprint in the statement of the main result of my paper [1] in all three instances where it was stated, namely, a logarithm is missing from the denominator. The second displayed equation of the abstract, the second displayed equation on page 85, and the final displayed equation of the paper in the theorem statement on page 111 should all read lim inf…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the spirit of [1,4,5,8] it is natural to consider gaps between products of two primes in number fields. Before stating our main result of this article, we will fix some notations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%