2017
DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000171586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalized Approach to Population Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It, however, cannot deal with multi-level populations, i.e., households and individuals. Improved versions are called Hierarchical IPF and Iterative Proportional Updating (IPU) (K ( K Müller, 2017;Sun et al, 2018). In contrast, CO-based population synthesis relies on the drawing of individuals from a sample to assess a fitness criterion.…”
Section: Population Synthesis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It, however, cannot deal with multi-level populations, i.e., households and individuals. Improved versions are called Hierarchical IPF and Iterative Proportional Updating (IPU) (K ( K Müller, 2017;Sun et al, 2018). In contrast, CO-based population synthesis relies on the drawing of individuals from a sample to assess a fitness criterion.…”
Section: Population Synthesis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the resulting synthetic population generated by using BN, we adopt a metric measuring goodness-of-fit, which is the standardized root mean square errors (SRMSE) (Müller, 2017):…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our baseline population is limited to just the Greater Melbourne region, home to around 4 million residents in 2011, the second largest cities in Australia, and the capital city of the Victoria state. To generate a baseline synthetic population, we followed a standard synthetic reconstruction procedure which involves two stages: fitting and generation (Müller, 2017).…”
Section: Initialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%