2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-018-1745-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized cubic moment and the Petersson formula for newforms

Abstract: Using a cubic moment, we prove a Weyl-type subconvexity bound for the quadratic twists of a holomorphic newform of square-free level, trivial nebentypus, and arbitrary even weight. This generalizes work of Conrey and Iwaniec in that the newform that is being twisted may have arbitrary square-free level, and also that the quadratic character may have even conductor. One of the new tools developed in this paper is a more general Petersson formula for newforms of square-free level.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Returning to Theorem 7.1, we see that Taking B = 1, we get 1 4π E t , E t = ν(N), and so (10.7) follows, as well as (10.8) E t , E t N = ν(N) E t , E t 1 where the subscript on the inner product symbol denotes the level of the group to which the inner product is attached. Hence where λ E (n) = τ iT (n); this is the analog of [PY,(2.8)]. We therefore need to evaluate the inner sum over φ, namely (10.9)…”
Section: Bruggeman-kuznetsov For Newformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Returning to Theorem 7.1, we see that Taking B = 1, we get 1 4π E t , E t = ν(N), and so (10.7) follows, as well as (10.8) E t , E t N = ν(N) E t , E t 1 where the subscript on the inner product symbol denotes the level of the group to which the inner product is attached. Hence where λ E (n) = τ iT (n); this is the analog of [PY,(2.8)]. We therefore need to evaluate the inner sum over φ, namely (10.9)…”
Section: Bruggeman-kuznetsov For Newformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here (10.9) is analogous to [PY,(3.2)]. At this point, all the calculations of T t (m, n) run completely parallel to those in [PY,Section 3], since the formulas that were used there are: Hecke relations, (10.7), and (10.8), which are the same in both cases of cusp forms vs. Eisenstein. Therefore, (10.4) holds with x = ∞.…”
Section: Bruggeman-kuznetsov For Newformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cf. [7, §2.5], and λpφq, µpφq are given with respect to (14) by λpφq " xd 1 e 1 e 0 e 1 φ, φy xφ, φy , µpφq " xd 1 e 0 e 1 e 0 φ, φy xφ, φy .…”
Section: The Spinor L-function and Böcherer's Conjecture For Oldformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the GLp2q case, such a formula is well-known and derived by first constructing an explicit orthogonal basis of oldforms and then applying Möbius inversion to sieve these forms out, cf. [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is due to Petrow who refined the estimate of Conrey and Iwaniec for the cubic moment of central L‐values of level q cusp forms twisted by quadratic characters of conductor q and showed that the role of the dual moment is played by the weighted fourth moment of Dirichlet L‐functions [, Theorems 1,2]. See also for related recent results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%