2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-016-0267-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized inverse-pole-figure method to analyze domain switching in polycrystalline ferroelectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the only method that allows separation of the size and strain contributions from single peak analysis with reasonable accuracy. From the GPF obtained via Langford, we obtain the GDF of defects based on the work of Rajmohan et al (1997), Bunge (1982), Wcislak & Bunge (1996) and others (Ryo & Ryo, 2016;Miller et al, 2005). The basis of our reasoning is that, if such GDF exists, it must be related to an ODF through an equation analogous to equation ( 8), which means that such distribution can be obtained by the same methods employed to obtain the ODF from the intensity pole figures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is the only method that allows separation of the size and strain contributions from single peak analysis with reasonable accuracy. From the GPF obtained via Langford, we obtain the GDF of defects based on the work of Rajmohan et al (1997), Bunge (1982), Wcislak & Bunge (1996) and others (Ryo & Ryo, 2016;Miller et al, 2005). The basis of our reasoning is that, if such GDF exists, it must be related to an ODF through an equation analogous to equation ( 8), which means that such distribution can be obtained by the same methods employed to obtain the ODF from the intensity pole figures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that this simple condition is envisioned to be fulfilled by many physical properties (almost by definition), there were also some practical difficulties precluding the complete application of that concept since its proposal. The method of GPFs is usually better used in the mode of generalized inverse pole figures to represent polar properties, which are properties depending only on the direction of a preferential crystal axis or even sometimes only on the sample orientation (Ryo & Ryo, 2016;Miller et al, 2005), but no complete analysis has been carried out by resourcing to the determination of generalized distribution functions (GDFs) and recalculation of the original PFs.…”
Section: The Methods Of Generalized Pole Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of RE, it is believed that the 4f electrons in the RE ions are responsible for the main part of the magnetic anisotropy and that the CEF acting on the 4f electrons dominates this property. [17] In case of the Gd compound, because of the zero orbital magnetic moment (L = 0) for Gd, [18] the spin-orbit coupling almost disappears and there is no crystal field anisotropy. High resolution synchrotron XRD results show that a major symmetry axis as a direction of easy magnetization, i.e., [111], can be obtained for GdFe 2 by adding a small amount of Tb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intrinsic properties given by Equation ( 12) depend on, and are limited by, the allowed polarization directions associated with the crystal symmetry of the FE phase(s) [59]. The maximum achievable properties of FE ceramics in a saturated poling state have been estimated from single-crystal data via probability density functions of orientation (PDFOs) [57], pole figures [62], inverse pole figures [63] and/or orientation distribution function (ODF) [60,64,65] methods. In these models, macroscopic properties are estimated as the averaged response of randomly oriented grains over the entire orientation space.…”
Section: Intrinsic Properties Of Ferroelectric Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the T and R phases, the saturated remnant polarization of FE ceramics, P * r , can be estimated from the magnitude of the spontaneous polarization in the single crystal as [57,59,60,[62][63][64][65]]…”
Section: Intrinsic Properties Of Ferroelectric Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%