2012
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalized Likelihood Ratio Chart for Monitoring Bernoulli Processes

Abstract: This paper considers the problem of monitoring the proportion p of nonconforming items when a continuous stream of Bernoulli observations is available and the objective is to effectively detect a wide range of increases in p. The proposed control chart is based on a generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) statistic obtained from a moving window of past Bernoulli observations. The Phase II performance of this chart in detecting sustained increases in p is evaluated using the steady state average number of observatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, it is sufficient to consider fewer shift directions than in Table 2, as all the components have the same in-control values. Table 3 gives the same conclusion about the set of two-sided Bernoulli CUSUM chart as we obtained from Table 2: The charts in column [4] with small predetermined shifts work well for shifts that are close to the tuning parameters, while the charts in column [6] work well for relatively large shifts.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Mglr Chart And The Set Of Twsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, it is sufficient to consider fewer shift directions than in Table 2, as all the components have the same in-control values. Table 3 gives the same conclusion about the set of two-sided Bernoulli CUSUM chart as we obtained from Table 2: The charts in column [4] with small predetermined shifts work well for shifts that are close to the tuning parameters, while the charts in column [6] work well for relatively large shifts.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Mglr Chart And The Set Of Twsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The parameters under each column label are used for the set of two-sided Bernoulli CUSUM charts with same column labels in Table 2 and 3. The columns labeled [1] to [3] in Table 1 show the tuning parameters and control limits of the charts for the Columns [4] to [6] in Table 1 list the tuning parameters of the set of two-sided Bernoulli CUSUM charts that are designed to detect small, medium, and large shifts when p 0 = (.25, .25, .25, .25). As the in-control parameters are the same for all the four components, we use the same predetermined shifts in the 3 sets of two-sided Bernoulli CUSUM charts in each case of columns [4] to [6].…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Mglr Chart And The Set Of Twmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early work was reviewed by Xie et al and Topalidou and Psarakis . Recent developments for monitoring binomial data include Xie et al, Huang et al, Huang et al, and Wang and Reynolds . As to the monitoring of multinomial data, one can refer to the probability tree method with h − 1 stages for h categories developed by Duran and Albin and cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart based on likelihood ratio test suggested by Ryan et al To follow up, Weiß and Yashchin made more recent contributions to monitoring multinomial data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GLR charts have some advantages that the size of the parameter change does not need to be specified and these charts have been shown to be very effective in a wide variety of settings in SPC applications. Recent investigations of this chart include Hawkins et al (2003), Runger and Testik (2003), Capizzi and Masarotto (2008), Zou et al (2009), Reynolds and Lou (2010), Huang et al (2012Huang et al ( , 2013, Xu et al (2012Xu et al ( , 2013, Wang and Reynolds (2013), and Reynolds et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%