2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized method for valuing agricultural farms under uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this approach, Baker et al (2014) used the beta coefficient estimated with CAPM to assess farmland value by comparison with market returns. Garcia et al (2017) developed a methodology that is particularly applicable to the valuation of nonmarket goods, or markets where little information is available, as may be the case with the valuation of agricultural land. Burt (1986) used the fundamental method that consists in discounting cash flows to estimate the value.…”
Section: Methods To Assess Farm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following this approach, Baker et al (2014) used the beta coefficient estimated with CAPM to assess farmland value by comparison with market returns. Garcia et al (2017) developed a methodology that is particularly applicable to the valuation of nonmarket goods, or markets where little information is available, as may be the case with the valuation of agricultural land. Burt (1986) used the fundamental method that consists in discounting cash flows to estimate the value.…”
Section: Methods To Assess Farm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major challenges is to assess farm value in a context where the market for farms is opaque. According to Garcia et al (2017, p. 121), “ the opacity of the farm market means that valuations are based primarily on expert estimates rather than on actual transaction prices .” The farm market may even not exist. Even if they are subject to sales and acquisitions, businesses in general and farms in particular are too heterogeneous and the terms of the transactions too disparate for these transactions to constitute a market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article assumes that automated valuation models (AVM) can provide significant support, accounting for most of the above‐mentioned expectations (Codosero Rodas et al, 2018; Demetriou, 2016; García, García, López, & Salmerón, 2017; McCluskey, McCord, Davis, Haran, & McIlhatton, 2013; Renigier‐Biłozor, Janowski, & d'Amato, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Increased objectivity for the owners, low cost, ensuring transparency of the valuation procedure (Codosero Rodas, Naranjo Gómez, Castanho, & Cabezas, 2018); This article assumes that automated valuation models (AVM) can provide significant support, accounting for most of the abovementioned expectations (Codosero Rodas et al, 2018;Demetriou, 2016;García, García, López, & Salmerón, 2017;McCluskey, McCord, Davis, Haran, & McIlhatton, 2013;Renigier-Biłozor, Janowski, & d'Amato, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used variable for measuring agrarian income is the area of the land being valued (Cañas et al, 1994;Caballer and Guadalajara, 2005). The analysis of the income from agricultural land also normally involves the valuation of other variables such as economic yield, the quality of the land, the risk of frost and the location (Aznar and Guijarro, 2004;García et al, 2017), which although they influence the profitability of the land are not the only factors affecting it. Other factors that directly affect the profitability of the land and therefore its real estate value are often ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%