2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2013.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized modular redundancy scheme for enhancing fault tolerance of combinational circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is due to the triplication of each module in the circuit. In comparison with the generalized modular redundancy scheme in [9], see that this technique has also a much larger area overhead (150%) compared to the area overhead of our proposed technique.…”
Section: E Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is due to the triplication of each module in the circuit. In comparison with the generalized modular redundancy scheme in [9], see that this technique has also a much larger area overhead (150%) compared to the area overhead of our proposed technique.…”
Section: E Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The most reliable unit is the unit with the highest history index. In [9], a generalized modular redundancy scheme is proposed for enhancing the fault tolerance of combinational circuits. In this technique, only the output combinations of the circuit with a high probability of occurrence are protected.…”
Section: A Hardware Redundancy-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generalized modular redundancy scheme has been presented in [17] to consider the probability of occurrence of each combination at the output of a circuit. The redundancy has been then added to only protect those combinations that have high probability of occurrence while the remaining combinations left unprotected to save area.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent approaches attempt to insert redundancies that protect against the most common errors or to resynthesize the circuit to improve reliability. In [9], an approach is proposed to provide protection for the most common output combinations. In [10], the authors propose the use of implications to build redundant logic that checks for violation of behavioural constraints.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%