2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109697
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized predictive model for TiO2–Catalyzed photo-degradation rate constants of water contaminants through artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of solution pH, it affects the overall charge of the catalyst and pollutant, and consequently, the adsorption of pollutants on the surface and degradation could be influenced. Thus, it is not necessarily correct that the pollutant degrades faster at higher pH because several MOFs with various structures have different responses to pH 51 . For instance, Zhang et al 57 reported that the pH 3 is the best value to degrade TC on MIL-88A, while Pan et al 61 claimed that the TC was degraded over AgI/UiO-66-NH 2 more rapidly in pH 4.3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of solution pH, it affects the overall charge of the catalyst and pollutant, and consequently, the adsorption of pollutants on the surface and degradation could be influenced. Thus, it is not necessarily correct that the pollutant degrades faster at higher pH because several MOFs with various structures have different responses to pH 51 . For instance, Zhang et al 57 reported that the pH 3 is the best value to degrade TC on MIL-88A, while Pan et al 61 claimed that the TC was degraded over AgI/UiO-66-NH 2 more rapidly in pH 4.3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance factor of water contaminant is obtained by adding the SHAP values of contaminant feature vector (vector of 1280 generated by EfficientNet). Figure 4 also compares the importance factors of the CNN_Aug model in this work and the previous ANN model [15]. The feature importances of the two models share the same orders: contaminant type > initial concentration > temperature > TiO2 dosage > pH > light intensity.…”
Section: Feature Importancementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) are used to assess the model performance. Three models are trained and compared: CNN model trained with augmented dataset (CNN_Aug), CNN model trained with original dataset (CNN_Ori), and ANN model trained using molecule fingerprints (ANN) published in ref [15]. The scatter plots of the predicted vs. experimental photocatalytic degradation-rate constants −log(k) are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Model Performance and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It stores the atomic and structural information of molecules in a binary digit vector, where "1" represents presence and "0" represents the absence of a particular substructure. It has shown the potentials to encode organic materials for machine learning models [34][35][36][37]. The advantages of MF representation include that the properties of small molecules can be predicted at high accuracy and with low computational time at the same time [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%