2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.02.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized variational approach for predicting contact angles of sessile nano-droplets on both flat and curved surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical and experimental studies of the macroscopic bers give a detailed description of the interaction force and the shape of the drop placed onto a ber [10][11][12][13] or a set of bers. [14][15][16] Since electrospun bers are usually far smaller than the liquid drops, their wetting is studied using sophisticated experimental procedures, such as attaching an individual nanober to an AFM tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical and experimental studies of the macroscopic bers give a detailed description of the interaction force and the shape of the drop placed onto a ber [10][11][12][13] or a set of bers. [14][15][16] Since electrospun bers are usually far smaller than the liquid drops, their wetting is studied using sophisticated experimental procedures, such as attaching an individual nanober to an AFM tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified Young–Lippmann equation to be applied is with C dpc as the capacitance of the double-layer (dielectric plus photoconductive layer) and V dpc as the voltage drop across the double-layer. Both the denominator as well as the parameter γ in the above equation are related to the Laplace pressure and its case-dependent significance, respectively [ 52 , 53 ], which get strong for microdroplets with volumes well below 1 μ l; the Laplace pressure (related to the strong surface curvature of small droplets) works against the reduction of surface tension.…”
Section: Further Ewod and Oew Details [ 1 – 13 34 – 44 ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the angle that the fluid makes with the wall while wetting is assumed to be 90 • . This is a standard assumption for solving sloshing flows [27,41].…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%