2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-020-01523-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic exact solver for vehicle routing and related problems

Abstract: Major advances were recently obtained in the exact solution of Vehicle Routing Problems (VRPs). Sophisticated Branch-Cut-and-Price (BCP) algorithms for some of the most classical VRP variants now solve many instances with up to a few hundreds of customers. However, adapting and reimplementing those successful algorithms for other variants can be a very demanding task. This work proposes a BCP solver for a generic model that encompasses a wide class of VRPs. It incorporates the key elements found in the best ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The set of 6 small 2D-HetVBPP instances (with up to 20 items) and the 50 large 2D-HetVBPP instances (with up to 1000 items) was prepared and used to test the efficiency of the algorithm. The specialized version of the algorithm solved some new instances (compared to results in [2], [6], [10], [19], [27], [36]) of the bench-mark set 2CBP [8] and the set of instances with larger demands [19]. More precisely, _ on 400 instances of the data set 2CBP [8], our solution approach solved 356 for 360 s and 365 for 1440 s of running time, _ 400 instances of the data set from [19], with 61 unsolved instances with the known upper and lower bounds, we provided 10 new optimal solutions and 4 new upper bounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The set of 6 small 2D-HetVBPP instances (with up to 20 items) and the 50 large 2D-HetVBPP instances (with up to 1000 items) was prepared and used to test the efficiency of the algorithm. The specialized version of the algorithm solved some new instances (compared to results in [2], [6], [10], [19], [27], [36]) of the bench-mark set 2CBP [8] and the set of instances with larger demands [19]. More precisely, _ on 400 instances of the data set 2CBP [8], our solution approach solved 356 for 360 s and 365 for 1440 s of running time, _ 400 instances of the data set from [19], with 61 unsolved instances with the known upper and lower bounds, we provided 10 new optimal solutions and 4 new upper bounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when it comes to the 50 larger instances from the classes: 1, 4, 5, 9 and 10, our RVNS was more successful in obtaining 31 solutions, compared to 20 solutions from [19], as displayed in Figure 3. On the set of 40 instances with 200 items belonging to classes: 1, 4, 5, and 9, our RVNS solved 22 instances for 360 s and 29 for the time limit of 1440 s, which is less then 35 solutions obtained in [27]. However, having in mind that our RVNS is pri-marily designed for solving 2D-Het VBPP, it is overall comparable with the most successful solution methods of 2D-Hom VBPP on 2CBP .…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While there has been much progress regarding computational results (see e.g. [18,19,22]), from the viewpoint of approximation algorithms only small progress has been made. The simple optimal tour partitioning algorithm by Altinkemer and Gavish [1], which achieves an approximation ratio of 3.5, has not been substantially improved in the past 30 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%