2013
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic unsupervised method for decomposing multi‐author documents

Abstract: Given an unsegmented multi‐author text, we wish to automatically separate out distinct authorial threads. We present a novel, entirely unsupervised, method that achieves strong results on multiple testbeds, including those for which authorial threads are topically identical. Unlike previous work, our method requires no specialized linguistic tools and can be easily applied to any text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For brevity, in the remainder of this paper, "unsupervised decomposition of a single multi author document" is shortened to "unsupervised authorship decomposition" or "authorship decomposition". The same problem is addressed in (Akiva & Koppel, 2013), except there, the number of authors is assumed known.…”
Section: Introduction Introduction Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For brevity, in the remainder of this paper, "unsupervised decomposition of a single multi author document" is shortened to "unsupervised authorship decomposition" or "authorship decomposition". The same problem is addressed in (Akiva & Koppel, 2013), except there, the number of authors is assumed known.…”
Section: Introduction Introduction Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BayesAD was empirically compared with AK, a modified version of the approach in (Akiva & Koppel, 2013). The details of AK are contained in Section 5 along with the definition of the accuracy metric used to quantify the comparison.…”
Section: Introduction Introduction Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations