2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-017-0977-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic assessment of seed production areas (SPAs) for restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are wildland sampling localities in most populations that exceed the levels of diversity represented by the commercial germplasm sources. These results contrast with the genetic diversity patterns resolved for other developed restoration materials (e.g., Broadhurst, Hopley, Li, & Begley, ). Furthermore, when expected heterozygosity and nucleotide diversity are directly compared between the commercial germplasm sources and all of the wildland sampling localities surrounding their putative origins (this includes some, but not all, of the sampling localities in the P/W and WGB populations), the median expected heterozygosity and nucleotide diversity are higher for the commercial germplasm sources than the wildland sampling localities (Supporting Information Table , graphic representation not shown).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are wildland sampling localities in most populations that exceed the levels of diversity represented by the commercial germplasm sources. These results contrast with the genetic diversity patterns resolved for other developed restoration materials (e.g., Broadhurst, Hopley, Li, & Begley, ). Furthermore, when expected heterozygosity and nucleotide diversity are directly compared between the commercial germplasm sources and all of the wildland sampling localities surrounding their putative origins (this includes some, but not all, of the sampling localities in the P/W and WGB populations), the median expected heterozygosity and nucleotide diversity are higher for the commercial germplasm sources than the wildland sampling localities (Supporting Information Table , graphic representation not shown).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In response, more resources are being devoted to the development and use of native plant materials (e.g., Basey, Fant, & Kramer, 2015;Erickson, 2008;Tischew, Youtie, Kirmer, & Shaw, 2011;Wood, Doherty, & Padgett, 2015), with the hope that restoration using native plant materials can help address specific environmental challenges, rejuvenate ecosystem function, and improve the delivery of ecosystem services (Hughes, Inouye, Johnson, Underwood, & Vellend, 2008). Concurrent research has focused on ensuring that native plant materials are "appropriate" for restoration sites (see, e.g., guidance provided by Plant Conservation Alliance 2015, as well as McKay, Christian, Harrison, & Rice, 2005;Broadhurst et al, 2008;Havens et al, 2015). From a genetic perspective, appropriate native plant materials are those that avoid (or mitigate) risks associated with the mixing of local and nonlocal genotypes (Vander Mijnsbrugge, Bischoff, & Smith, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…growing source populations in a nursery setting and allowing them to cross, producing a large quantity of seeds that is more diverse and presumably less inbred than any single source population). Producing seeds in a nursery setting may be necessary when insufficient plant material is available from source populations, or when source populations have limited diversity or show signs of inbreeding depression (Broadhurst et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While approaches to increase diversity and alleviate inbreeding in plant materials for restoration and reintroduction are advancing on multiple continents, including Europe (Bucharova et al ), North America (Dolan et al ), and Australia (Broadhurst et al ), little empirical data are available to evaluate the effects of nursery production of mixed‐source plant materials on the diversity of the resulting crop used to implement reintroductions. Multiple steps in the production process have been identified where unintentional changes in diversity may occur (Basey et al ; Espeland et al ), but few have been investigated in real‐world settings, making it challenging to understand the likelihood and relative strength of potential genetic bottlenecks in the production process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of genetic diversity were comparable between the Seed Production Areas at Numurkah and Dookie and natural populations (Broadhurst et al . ). However, significant inbreeding was observed in many remnants and their associated seed crops ‐ as well as some seed production areas and the seed crops that these were producing.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%