Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation
DOI: 10.1109/icec.1996.542671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic local search algorithm for solving symmetric and asymmetric traveling salesman problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
10

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
108
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, it iterates r times over the following two steps. First, it chooses two among the best m solutions in A with respect to a weighted sum based on randomly generated weights; these two solutions are then recombined by the distance-preserving crossover [46]. Next, it applies a different iterative improvement algorithm based on the 2-exchange neighborhood to the new recombined solution using the same weighted sum scalarization; the resulting local optimum s * is added to archive CS if it is better than the worst solution among the m best solutions according to the weight vector considered; finally s * is added to archive A, if no solution dominates it and the archive A is updated.…”
Section: Comparison With a State-of-the-art Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, it iterates r times over the following two steps. First, it chooses two among the best m solutions in A with respect to a weighted sum based on randomly generated weights; these two solutions are then recombined by the distance-preserving crossover [46]. Next, it applies a different iterative improvement algorithm based on the 2-exchange neighborhood to the new recombined solution using the same weighted sum scalarization; the resulting local optimum s * is added to archive CS if it is better than the worst solution among the m best solutions according to the weight vector considered; finally s * is added to archive A, if no solution dominates it and the archive A is updated.…”
Section: Comparison With a State-of-the-art Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar techniques can be found for other combinatorial problems, e.g. see the distance preserving crossover for the traveling salesman problem [Freisleben and Merz, 1996]. However, our crossover is not intended to ensure equal distances between the offspring solution and parents; this issue is indirectly addressed only by the rejection and replacement strategies.…”
Section: ])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5장은 실험 결과를 고찰하여, 향후 발전 방향과 과제를 제시하였다. GA는 인공유전 시스템으로 자연세계의 진화과정에 기초 한 계산모델로 John Holland에 의해서 1975년 개발된 전역 적인 최적화 알고리즘이다 [3]. GA는 풀고자 하는 문제에 대 한 가능한 해들을 정해진 형태의 자료구조로 표현한 다음 이들을 점차적으로 변형함으로써 점점 더 좋은 해들을 만들 어 낸다 [15].…”
unclassified
“…따라서 TSP에 적합한 제약조건을 만족하는 연산자를 사용해야 한 다 [15]. 이와 같이 제약조건을 만족하는 알려진 GA 연산자 로는 REVERSE, TRANSPORT, SWEEP, ORDER CROSSOVER, CYCLE CROSSOVER, PARTIALLY MATCHED CROSSOVER, EDGE RECOMBINATION 등 의 연산자가 있다 [3][16] [15].…”
unclassified