“…The number of non-Indian subjects tested in South America (23,839) is about 40% higher than the total number of Indians (Table 2). There are now 13 variants that (1994); Krahó, 193, Neel (1978); Macushi, 694, Neel et al (1977), Salzano et al (1984); Mundurucu, 361, Salzano et al (1991), Santos et al (1998); Noanama, 155, Kirk et al (1974); Pacaá s Novos, 222, Salzano et al (1985b); Palikour, 115, Santos et al (1998); Parakanã , 252, Black et al (1980Black et al ( , 1988; Quechua, 39, Modiano et al (1972); Sateré-Mawé, 170, Salzano et al (1985a);Surui, 198, Callegari-Jacques et al (1994), Salzano et al (1998); Tenharim, 20, Santos et al (1998);Ticuna, 761, Neel et al (1980); Urubu-Kaapor, 205, Black et al (1988); Waiã pi, 361, Tchen et al (1978), Black et al (1983); Wai Wai, 166, Callegari-Jacques et al (1996); Zoró, 76, Salzano et al (1998 Tables 1 and 2 is more meaningful when considered in the context of the information provided in Tables 3 and 4. The provisional assignment of Belém 2 to albumin México by direct electrophoretic comparisons in four buffer systems is rendered plausible by previous studies in which the structural studies confirmed the electrophoretic findings (see Arai et al, 1989), as well as by the present results concerning albumin Fortaleza.…”