2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-74382009000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic symbiotic algorithm applied to the one-dimensional cutting stock problem

Abstract: This work presents a genetic symbiotic algorithm to minimize the number of objects and the setup in a one-dimensional cutting stock problem. The algorithm implemented can generate combinations of ordered lengths of stock (the cutting pattern) and, at the same time, the frequency of the cutting patterns, through a symbiotic process between two distinct populations, solutions and cutting patterns. Working with two objectives in the fitness function and with a symbiotic relationship between the two populations, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the direct comparison between the two GAs, observe that in Tables 5 and 6 we compare our method, which finds, for each instance, a set of non-dominated solutions, against other methods including the method presented in Golfeto et al (2009a) which finds only one solution for each instance. Referring to the results presented in Table 5, we are comparing our method against Symbio1 which is the best (in terms of saving in waste) single objective method presented in Golfeto et al (2009a). Even comparing with Symbio1, we obtain slightly better results.…”
Section: Randomly Generated Data Setmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding the direct comparison between the two GAs, observe that in Tables 5 and 6 we compare our method, which finds, for each instance, a set of non-dominated solutions, against other methods including the method presented in Golfeto et al (2009a) which finds only one solution for each instance. Referring to the results presented in Table 5, we are comparing our method against Symbio1 which is the best (in terms of saving in waste) single objective method presented in Golfeto et al (2009a). Even comparing with Symbio1, we obtain slightly better results.…”
Section: Randomly Generated Data Setmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Other approaches first optimize a regular objective such as the minimization of the number of objects used or the waste, and next find a solution that minimizes the number of cutting patterns used ( Cui, Zhong, & Yao, 2015;Foerster & Wäscher, 20 0 0;Yanasse & Limeira, 20 06 ). Some papers also consider a multi-objective problem ( de Araujo, Poldi, & Smith, 2014;Golfeto, Moretti, & de Salles Neto, 2009 ). A literature review on the cutting stock problem with setups can be found in Henn and Wäscher (2013) .…”
Section: Decision Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First techniques used only constructive heuristics [3,12,15] or mathematical formulations [6,14]. However, over the last years, many metaheuristics approaches have obtained significant results in several areas [1,8,17,19,20,24,25], including validation and comparison with third-party software like [10]. They are particularly applied to the multi-mode version of RCPSP, where a task can be executed in different ways, using different amount of resources [4,5].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%